Limits of computational biology

Abstract Are we close to a complete inventory of living processes so that we might expect in the near future to reproduce every essential aspect necessary for life? Or are there mechanisms and processes in cells and organisms that are presently inaccessible to us? Here I argue that a close examination of a particularly well-understood system— that of Escherichia coli chemotaxis— shows we are still a long way from a complete description. There is a level of molecular uncertainty, particularly that responsible for fine-tuning and adaptation to myriad external conditions, which we presently cannot resolve or reproduce on a computer. Moreover, the same uncertainty exists for any process in any organism and is especially pronounced and important in higher animals such as humans. Embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, immune recognition, memory formation, and survival in the real world, all depend on vast numbers of subtle variations in cell chemistry most of which are presently unknown or only poorly characterized. Overcoming these limitations will require us to not only accumulate large quantities of highly detailed data but also develop new computational methods able to recapitulate the massively parallel processing of living cells.

[1]  Jonathan R. Karr,et al.  A Whole-Cell Computational Model Predicts Phenotype from Genotype , 2012, Cell.

[2]  Albert Libchaber,et al.  Effects of population density and chemical environment on the behavior of Escherichia coli in shallow temperature gradients. , 2011, Physical biology.

[3]  R. Service The brain chip. , 2014, Science.

[4]  D. Blair,et al.  Adjusting the Spokes of the Flagellar Motor with the DNA-Binding Protein H-NS , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Post‐translational modification: nature's escape from genetic imprisonment and the basis for dynamic information encoding , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[6]  H. Mori,et al.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Topology and Dynamics of the Zebrafish Segmentation Clock Core Circuit , 2012, PLoS biology.

[8]  Irving P. Herman,et al.  Biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering , 2014 .

[9]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway , 2012, Nature.

[10]  A. Ay,et al.  Short-lived Her proteins drive robust synchronized oscillations in the zebrafish segmentation clock , 2013, Development.

[11]  A. Routtenberg Long-lasting memory from evanescent networks. , 2008, European journal of pharmacology.

[12]  Dennis Bray,et al.  The Chemotactic Behavior of Computer-Based Surrogate Bacteria , 2007, Current Biology.

[13]  O. Pourquié,et al.  Avian hairy Gene Expression Identifies a Molecular Clock Linked to Vertebrate Segmentation and Somitogenesis , 1997, Cell.

[14]  Y. Tu Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.