Effect of phenotypic selection on stochastic gene expression.

Genetically identical cells in the same population can take on phenotypically variable states, leading to differentiated responses to external signals, such as nutrients and drug-induced stress. Many models and experiments have focused on a description based on discrete phenotypic states. Here, we consider the effects of selection acting on a single trait, which we explicitly link to the variable number of proteins expressed by a gene. Considering different regulatory models for the gene under selection, we calculate the steady-state distribution of expression levels and show how the population adapts its expression to enhance its fitness. We quantitatively relate the overall fitness of the population to the heritability of expression levels and their diversity within the population. We show how selection can increase or decrease the variability in the population, alter the stability of bimodal states, and impact the switching rates between metastable attractors.

[1]  Jacek Miȩkisz,et al.  Gene Expression in Self-repressing System with Multiple Gene Copies , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[2]  N. Shoresh,et al.  Regulation of phenotypic variability by a threshold-based mechanism underlies bacterial persistence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[4]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[5]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[6]  S. Leibler,et al.  Individual histories and selection in heterogeneous populations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Andrew Mugler,et al.  Analytic methods for modeling stochastic regulatory networks. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  A. B. Bortz,et al.  A new algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of Ising spin systems , 1975 .

[9]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Self-regulating gene: an exact solution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Regulatory Control and the Costs and Benefits of Biochemical Noise , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Adaptive Response of a Gene Network to Environmental Changes by Fitness-Induced Attractor Selection , 2006, PloS one.

[12]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Robust circadian clocks from coupled protein-modification and transcription–translation cycles , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[14]  H. E. Kubitschek,et al.  Chromosome Replication and the Division Cycle of Escherichia coli B/r , 1971, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  M. Thattai,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments , 2004, Genetics.

[16]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Epigenetics as a first exit problem. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[17]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  The Value of Information for Populations in Varying Environments , 2010, ArXiv.

[18]  T. Yomo,et al.  Stochastic Switching Induced Adaptation in a Starved Escherichia coli Population , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[20]  William Bialek,et al.  Stability and Noise in Biochemical Switches , 2000, NIPS.

[21]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Yoichiro Ito,et al.  On the relation between fluctuation and response in biological systems , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Yoichiro Ito,et al.  How selection affects phenotypic fluctuation , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[25]  R. Singer,et al.  Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene , 2006, Current Biology.

[26]  Mads Kærn,et al.  A chance at survival: gene expression noise and phenotypic diversification strategies , 2009, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[28]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[29]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[30]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[31]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.

[32]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[33]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[34]  Gábor Balázsi,et al.  Mapping the Environmental Fitness Landscape of a Synthetic Gene Circuit , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  G. Price.  Fisher's ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear , 1972, Annals of human genetics.

[36]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[37]  N. Balaban,et al.  The importance of being persistent: heterogeneity of bacterial populations under antibiotic stress. , 2009, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[38]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Transient-mediated fate determination in a transcriptional circuit of HIV , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[39]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Self-consistent proteomic field theory of stochastic gene switches. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Ido Golding,et al.  Eukaryotic Transcription: What Does It Mean for a Gene to Be ‘on’? , 2006, Current Biology.

[41]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[42]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  On the distribution of state values of reproducing cells , 2005, Physical biology.

[43]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence , 2005, Genetics.

[45]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Architecture-Dependent Noise Discriminates Functionally Analogous Differentiation Circuits , 2009, Cell.