On the Bradley hypothesis concerning agrammatism: The nonword-interference effect

In 1980, D. C. Bradley, M. F. Garrett, and E. B. Zurif (in D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological studies of mental processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) have proposed a lexical hypothesis on agrammatism. The theoretical background of this hypothesis is described. Then two experiments are reported with normal speakers on the so-called nonword-interference effect that has been one of the two major sources of experimental evidence for this hypothesis. The first experiment replicates the original finding that the interference effect is found when the nonword starts with a content word but not when it starts with a function word. In the second experiment, it is shown that this contrast is due to an artifact of the composition of the word list. When this list contains both content and function words, rather than only content words--as in Bradley's experiments and our Experiment I--both content and function nonwords show an equally sized interference effect. The consequences for the lexical hypothesis are discussed.

[1]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[2]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity , 1982, Brain and Language.

[3]  Mary-Louise Kean,et al.  Agrammatism: A phonological deficit? , 1979, Cognition.

[4]  Mary-Louise Kean,et al.  The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example , 1977, Cognition.

[5]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  10 – Remarks on the Relation between Language Production and Language Comprehension Systems , 1982 .

[6]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[7]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Closed- and open-class lexical access in agrammatic and fluent aphasics , 1983, Brain and Language.

[8]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[9]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[10]  D. Bradley,et al.  Computational distinctions of vocabulary type , 1978 .

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[12]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) , 1979 .

[13]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[14]  M. Taft.  Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[15]  David Caplan,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Structures in Agrammatism , 1985 .

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca's aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  Juan Segui,et al.  The word frequency effect and lexical access , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  Word and Sentence Perception , 1978 .

[19]  John Lyons,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics , 1971 .

[20]  M. Taft.  Prefix Stripping Revisited. , 1981 .

[21]  H. H. Clark.  Psychology and language , 1977 .

[22]  Werkgroep Frequentie-onderzoek van het Nederlands,et al.  Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands , 1975 .