Using Uncertainty Information to Combine Soft Classifications

The classification of remote sensing images performed with different classifiers usually produces different results. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the outputs of different soft classifications may be combined to increase the classification accuracy, using the uncertainty information to choose the best class to assign to each pixel. If there is disagreement between the outputs obtained with the several classifiers, the proposed method selects the class to assign to the pixel choosing the one that presents less uncertainty. The proposed approach was applied to an IKONOS image, which was classified using two supervised soft classifiers, the Multi-layer Perceptron neural network classifier and a fuzzy classifier based on the underlying logic of the Minimum-Distance-to-Means. The overall accuracy of the classification obtained with the combination of both classifications with the proposed methodology was higher than the overall accuracy of the original classifications, which shows that the methodology is promising and may be used to increase classification accuracy.

[1]  B. Lees,et al.  Combining Non-Parametric Models for Multisource Predictive Forest Mapping , 2004 .

[2]  C. K. Chow,et al.  On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff , 1970, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Increasing soft classification accuracy through the use of an ensemble of classifiers , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[4]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[5]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Detection of urban housing development by fusing multisensor satellite data and performing spatial feature post-classification , 2001 .

[6]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Statistical Rigor and Practical Utility in Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment , 2001 .

[7]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Uncertainty and Confidence in Land Cover Classification Using a Hybrid Classifier Approach , 2004 .

[8]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: Statistical and artificial neural network approaches , 2001 .

[9]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction Neural networks in remote sensing , 1997 .

[10]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimating per‐pixel thematic uncertainty in remote sensing classifications , 2009 .

[11]  Hoel Le Capitaine,et al.  Classification with Reject Options in a Logical Framework: a fuzzy residual implication approach , 2009, IFSA/EUSFLAT Conf..

[12]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Increasing soft classification accuracy through the use of an ensemble of classifiers , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[13]  Daniel G. Brown,et al.  Supervised classification of types of glaciated landscapes using digital elevation data , 1998 .

[14]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Integration of classification methods for improvement of land-cover map accuracy , 2002 .

[15]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Fuzzy Classifier Design , 2000, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[16]  George J. Klir,et al.  Generalized information theory: aims, results, and open problems , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Yi Lu,et al.  Knowledge integration in a multiple classifier system , 2004, Applied Intelligence.