Determining Electromagnetic Exposure Compliance of Multi-Antenna Devices in Linear Time

Electromagnetic exposure metrics such as specific absorption rate (SAR) are used to assess the user safety of portable wireless devices under all transmitting conditions. When there are multiple transmitter chains operating at a single frequency, the process of determining compliance is complicated by the fact that testing needs to cover all possible combinations of transmissions from all antennas. For <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula> antennas, the number of possible distinct transmitted signals can grow quickly with <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. We propose a compliance test whose measurement time burden is linear in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, independently of the number or type of transmitted signals. For <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N\geq 3$ </tex-math></inline-formula> antennas, the proposed test requires <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$7N-12$ </tex-math></inline-formula> excitations and corresponding measurements per probe location. Using analysis, simulations, and measurements with SAR compliance tools, we establish the accuracy of the method as compared with exhaustive measurements over all possible transmitted signals. The method is useful in evaluating the compliance of portable devices that use codebooks or beamforming as part of their transmission capabilities.

[1]  Robert J. Renka,et al.  Multivariate interpolation of large sets of scattered data , 1988, TOMS.

[2]  N. Higham Analysis of the Cholesky Decomposition of a Semi-definite Matrix , 1990 .

[3]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Methodology to interpolate and extrapolate SAR measurements in a volume in dosimetric experiment , 2001 .

[4]  C. Soras,et al.  Analysis and design of an inverted-F antenna printed on a PCMCIA card for the 2.4 GHz ISM band , 2002 .

[5]  J.-C. Bolomey Overview of fast SAR assessment techniques , 2008, 2008 International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials.

[6]  H. Shirai,et al.  Theoretical Analysis for Temperature Elevation of Human Body Due to Millimeter Wave Exposure , 2008, 2008 Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference.

[7]  国際非電離放射線防護委員会 ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 2009, Health physics.

[8]  Chester Sungchung Park,et al.  Evolution of uplink MIMO for LTE-advanced , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Ronan Sauleau,et al.  Millimeter-wave interactions with the human body: state of knowledge and recent advances , 2011, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies.

[10]  Debabrata K. Karmokar,et al.  Analysis of Inverted-F and Loaded Inverted-F Antennas for 2.4 GHz ISM Band Applications , 2011 .

[11]  A. Faraone,et al.  Exposure Compliance Methodologies for Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Enabled Networks and Terminals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  E. Y. Lam,et al.  Mobile-Phone Antenna Design , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[13]  David James Love,et al.  SAR codes , 2013, 2013 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[14]  Lira Hamada,et al.  Measurement procedure to determine SAR of multiple antenna transmitters using scalar electric field probes , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC 2014).

[15]  Buon Kiong Lau,et al.  Efficient evaluation of specific absorption rate (SAR) for MIMO terminals , 2014 .

[16]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  David James Love,et al.  Incorporating specific absorption rate constraints into wireless signal design , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Dinh Thanh Le,et al.  A method in determination of the specific absorption rate of multi-antenna devices , 2014, 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI).

[19]  Steve Wicinski Code of Federal Regulations Search Form , 2014 .

[20]  D. Colombi,et al.  Implications of EMF Exposure Limits on Output Power Levels for 5G Devices Above 6 GHz , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[21]  Dawei Ying,et al.  Closed-Loop Precoding and Capacity Analysis for Multiple-Antenna Wireless Systems With User Radiation Exposure Constraints , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Past, present, and future of SAR evaluations , 2016, 2016 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (URSI AP-RASC).

[23]  David James Love,et al.  Hybrid precoding for millimeter wave systems with a constraint on user electromagnetic radiation exposure , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[24]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Comprehensive validation and uncertainty evaluation of new SAR measurement technologies , 2016, 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[25]  Bo Xu,et al.  Power Density Measurements at 15 GHz for RF EMF Compliance Assessments of 5G User Equipment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[26]  Teruo Onishi,et al.  A Fast Estimation Technique for Evaluating the Specific Absorption Rate of Multiple-Antenna Transmitting Devices , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[27]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  Mixed quadratic model for peak spatial-average SAR of coherent multiple antenna devices , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.

[28]  Ryan Brown,et al.  Prospects for Millimeter-Wave Compliance Measurement Technologies [Measurements Corner] , 2017, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[29]  Bertrand M. Hochwald,et al.  Multi-Antenna SAR Estimationin Linear Time , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.