STRATEGISING IN AND THROUGH MICRO-PRACTICES AND SOCIAL CONTEXTS : A STRUCTURATIONIST PERSPECTIVE

AND SOCIAL CONTEXTS: A STRUCTURATIONIST PERSPECTIVE Linda Rouleau HEC-Montréal The structurationist perspective offers a pertinent avenue of reflection for renewing knowledge in strategy. By considering strategy as a structure of social activity, the structurationist perspective provides an understanding of how strategy, through the use of rules and resources, is produced and reproduced in the interactions of knowledgeable and reflexive agents. To illustrate this point of view, I present two episodes that demonstrate how ties with clientele are transformed in daily life in a top-of-theline clothing company undergoing reorganisation. Analysis of these episodes highlights three micro-practices of structuration of strategy: translating the orientation, disciplining the client, and justifying the change. The analysis also demonstrates that strategic activity is, by overcoding, embedded in contexts such as industry and society. The paper ends by outlining the elements of a structurationist perspective of strategising.

[1]  J. Sydow,et al.  Organizing and Evaluating Interfirm Networks: a Structurationist Perspective on Network Processes and Effectiveness , 1998 .

[2]  D. Barry,et al.  Strategy Retold: Toward a Narrative View of Strategic Discourse , 1997 .

[3]  David Knights,et al.  MANAGEMENT, MASCULINITY AND MANIPULATION: FROM PATERNALISM TO CORPORATE STRATEGY IN FINANCIAL SERVICES IN BRITAIN* , 1993 .

[4]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Shaping Conversations: Making Strategy, Managing Change , 1996 .

[5]  D. Knights,et al.  Gendering Jobs: Corporate Strategy, Managerial Control and the Dynamics of Job Segregation , 1991 .

[6]  F. Westley Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion , 1990 .

[7]  Andreas Georg Scherer,et al.  Pluralism and Incommensurability in Strategic Management and Organization Theory: A Problem in Search of a Solution , 1998 .

[8]  J. Ford,et al.  The Role Of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[9]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[10]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[11]  D. Knights,et al.  ‘The Best is Yet to Come?’: The Quest for Embodiment in Managerial Work , 1996 .

[12]  J. Kimberly,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Development and Change: How the Past Shapes the Present and Constrains the Future , 1995 .

[13]  David Knights,et al.  Changing Spaces: The Disruptive Impact of a New Epistemological Location for the Study of Management , 1992 .

[14]  Y. Sarason A model of organizational transformation: The incorporation of organizational identity into a struct , 1995 .

[15]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Corporate Structure: from Policy to Practice , 2001 .

[16]  Ann L. Cunliffe,et al.  Managers as Practical Authors: Reconstructing our Understanding of Management Practice , 2001 .