Improving base-of-the-pyramid consumer welfare through mobile technology services

Purpose Recent development and democratization of digital technologies call for studying base-of-the-pyramid (BOP) consumers’ interactions with these technologies. This study aims to explore how BOP consumers interact with mobile information and communication technology (mICT) and improve their welfare. Design/methodology/approach Following an extensive literature review, content analysis of the reviewed articles and reports was conducted to build this article’s conceptual foundation. Findings This study has conceptualized five mechanisms in which mICT improves the lives of BOP customers through enhanced access and control of resources. In particular, the authors characterize a converging nature of mICT and related applications (social media, internet of things, artificial intelligence and sharing economy) as resources for social change. The authors find a striking contrast between BOP and affluent consumers regarding their motivations and barriers to adopting mICT-based applications. Implications to research, technology design and policymaking are discussed. Originality/value The intersection of mICT and BOP is under-researched. With this paper, we tried to address this research gap. Further, this study has brought out several important research questions in each application, serving as a springboard for future researchers.

[1]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  How does value co-creation transform quality of life at the bottom of the pyramid? , 2021 .

[2]  Jennifer Takhar,et al.  A critical technocultural discourse analysis of Muslim fashion bloggers in France: charting ‘restorative technoscapes’ , 2021 .

[3]  Gema Del Río Castro,et al.  Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  A. Bonamigo,et al.  Industry 4.0 in services: challenges and opportunities for value co-creation , 2020 .

[5]  Assunta Di Vaio,et al.  Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[6]  Manfred Krafft,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Marketing Scholars in Times of the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2020, Journal of Interactive Marketing.

[7]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  AI voice bots: a services marketing research agenda , 2020 .

[8]  R. Hill,et al.  Consumer Vulnerability , 2020, Journal of Consumer Psychology.

[9]  R. Rust.  The future of marketing , 2020, International Journal of Research in Marketing.

[10]  Divya Ramachandran,et al.  Influence of new-age technologies on marketing: A research agenda , 2020 .

[11]  Bernd H. Schmitt.  From Atoms to Bits and Back: A Research Curation on Digital Technology and Agenda for Future Research , 2019, Journal of Consumer Research.

[12]  Jan H. Schumann,et al.  Influence of company Facebook activities on recruitment success , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[13]  A. Stephen,et al.  The future of social media in marketing , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[14]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[15]  James Goulding,et al.  Food Sharing, Redistribution, and Waste Reduction via Mobile Applications: A Social Network Analysis , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[16]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases , 2019, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Yubo Chen,et al.  Commentary: Marketing and the Sharing Economy: Digital Economy and Emerging Market Challenges , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[18]  A. Rindfleisch,et al.  Marketing in the Sharing Economy , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[19]  Dennis Philip,et al.  Financial literacy and fraud detection* , 2019, Financial Literacy and Responsible Finance in the FinTech Era.

[20]  M. Viswanathan,et al.  Consumers and technology in a changing world: the perspective from subsistence marketplaces , 2019, European Journal of Marketing.

[21]  Mehrdad Koohikamali,et al.  Social network migration and anonymity expectations: What anonymous social network apps offer , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  New product introductions for low-income consumers in emerging markets , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[23]  H. Thomas,et al.  Pathways to Inclusive Growth: Social Capital and the Bottom of the Pyramid , 2019, Inclusive Growth.

[24]  Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh,et al.  The effects of national cultural values on individuals' intention to participate in peer-to-peer sharing economy , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[25]  Alan J. Gow,et al.  Facebook use and its association with subjective happiness and loneliness , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  K. Zander,et al.  A Global Review of Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Risks and Risk Management Strategies , 2019, Agriculture.

[27]  E. Wallace,et al.  Improving consumers’ willingness to pay using social media activities , 2018, Journal of Services Marketing.

[28]  R. Tulder,et al.  Inclusive Business at the Base of the Pyramid: The Role of Embeddedness for Enabling Social Innovations , 2018, Journal of Business Ethics.

[29]  Zia Mehrabi,et al.  How much of the world's food do smallholders produce? , 2018, Global Food Security.

[30]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach , 2018 .

[31]  Carmel Foley,et al.  The sharing economy and digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb , 2018 .

[32]  Uthayasankar Sivarajah,et al.  Investigating the effects of smart technology on customer dynamics and customer experience , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  V. Kumar,et al.  A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy , 2017 .

[34]  M. Viswanathan,et al.  The subsistence marketplaces approach to poverty , 2017 .

[35]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Digital Marketing: A Framework, Review and Research Agenda , 2017 .

[36]  Lerzan Aksoy,et al.  Customer Engagement in a Big Data World , 2016 .

[37]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  The path to purchase and attribution modeling: Introduction to special section , 2016 .

[38]  Morad Benyoucef,et al.  Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  Ming-Hsien Yang,et al.  Co-creating value with consumers through social media , 2016 .

[40]  R. Belk.  You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online , 2014 .

[41]  Ronald Paul Hill,et al.  Life Satisfaction, Self-Determination, and Consumption Adequacy at the Bottom of the Pyramid , 2012 .

[42]  C. Markides,et al.  The Last Frontier: Market Creation in Conflict Zones, Deep Rural Areas, and Urban Slums , 2010 .

[43]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  E. Duflo,et al.  Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya , 2009 .

[45]  Clifford J. Shultz,et al.  The Paradoxical Relationships between Marketing and Vulnerability , 2009 .

[46]  B. Datta,et al.  Retailer selection compulsion in the subsistence markets , 2020 .

[47]  Chris J. Martin.  The sharing economy: : A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? , 2016 .

[48]  Muhammad Nazrul Islam,et al.  Journal of Systems and Information Technology A systematic literature review of semiotics perception in user interfaces , 2016 .

[49]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Bottom of the Pyramid as a Source of Breakthrough Innovations , 2012 .