A syntactic account of light verb phenomena in Japanese

A syntactic account of light verb phenomena in Japanese is proposed in preference to Grimshaw and Mester's (1988) argument transfer account. A close examination of the suru construction (in which the light verb suru occurs with a verbal noun) suggests that the argument transfer account cannot explain certain facts of this construction (e.g., “transfer” of adjuncts). In addition, contrary to a previous assumption, many verbs other than suru - all raising or control verbs — exhibit the crucial properties of a light verb. Light verb properties of these raising and control verbs can be explained once these light verb constructions are recognized as raising or control constructions, in which the verbal noun heads a syntactic predicative complement of these verbs. In the proposed analysis, “transferred” arguments are syntactically displaced out of the predicative complement, as is generally possible with raising/ control constructions. This view, together with independently motivated Japanese phrase structure rules, accounts for all the light verb properties of those verbs without any special mechanism such as Argument Transfer. This analysis can also be extended to suru, which can function as a control verb. An LFG analysis incorporating this idea is proposed, utilizing the notion of Functional Uncertainty.

[1]  Alex Alsina,et al.  On the argument structure of causatives , 1992 .

[2]  Miriam Butt The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu , 1995 .

[3]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Light verbs and 'th'-marking , 1988 .

[4]  T. Mohanan Argument structure in Hindi , 1994 .

[5]  S. E. Martin A Reference Grammar of Japanese , 1975 .

[6]  Mariko Saiki Grammatical functions in the syntax of Japanese nominals , 1987 .

[7]  Joan Bresnan Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar. , 1994 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[9]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Lexical categories in Japanese , 1987 .

[10]  Han Mk,et al.  Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. , 1993 .

[11]  Lioba J. Moshi,et al.  Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax , 1990 .

[12]  N. Terui,et al.  ARTERIAL BARORECEPTOR REFLEX IN GROWING RATS , 1985 .

[13]  E. Williams Thematic structure in syntax , 1994 .

[14]  Yo Matsumoto On the Lexical Nature of Purposive and Participial Complex Motion Predicates in Japanese , 1991 .

[15]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Unaccusative, passive and quirky case , 1990 .

[16]  Taro Kageyama,et al.  Light verb constructions and the syntax-morphology interface , 1991 .

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Butt,et al.  Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy , 1995 .

[18]  Natsuko Tsujimura Ergativity fo nouns and case assignment , 1990 .

[19]  Kanefusa Kato,et al.  S100ao (αα) protein is mainly located in the heart and striated muscles , 1985 .

[20]  Michiko Terada,et al.  Incorporation and argument structure in Japanese , 1990 .

[21]  B. Levin Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[22]  M. Saito Long distance scrambling in Japanese , 1992 .

[23]  Taro Kageyama,et al.  Incorporation and Sino-Japanese Verbs , 1976 .

[24]  Shigeru Miyagawa Light verbs and the ergative hypothesis , 1989 .

[25]  M. Nakayama,et al.  Japanese verbal noun constructions , 1993 .

[26]  Stanley Dubinsky Japanese union constructions : a unified analysis of -sase and -rare , 1988 .

[27]  加藤 泰彦,et al.  Negative sentences in Japanese , 1985 .

[28]  M. Saito Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications , 1985 .

[29]  Tracy Holloway King Configuring topic and focus in Russian , 1995 .

[30]  Natsuko Tsujimura Licensing nominal clauses: The case of deverbal nominals in Japanese , 1992 .

[31]  Alex Alsina,et al.  Predicate composition : a theory of syntactic function alternations , 1993 .

[32]  Yo Matsumoto On the Wordhood of Complex Predicates in Japanese , 1998 .

[33]  A. Belletti,et al.  Psych-verbs and θ-theory , 1988 .

[34]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .