Dynamic Modeling of In‐Use Cement Stocks in the United States

Summary A dynamic substance-flow model is developed to characterize the stocks and flows of cement utilized during the 20th century in the United States, using the generic cement life cycle as a systems boundary. The motivation for estimating historical inventories of cement stocks and flows is to provide accurate estimates of contemporary cement in-use stocks in U.S. infrastructure and future discards to relevant stakeholders in U.S. infrastructure, such as the federal and state highway administrators, departments of transportation, public and private utilities, and the construction and cement industries. Such information will assist in planning future rehabilitation projects and better life cycle management of infrastructure systems. In the present policy environment of climate negotiations, estimates of in-use cement infrastructure can provide insights about to what extent built environment can act as a carbon sink over its lifetime. The rate of addition of new stock, its composition, and the repair of existing stock are key determinants of infrastructure sustainability. Based upon a probability of failure approach, a dynamic stock and flow model was developed utilizing three statistical lifetime distributions— Weibull, gamma, and lognormal—for each cement end-use. The model-derived estimate of the “in-use” cement stocks in the United States is in the range of 4.2 to 4.4 billion metric tons (gigatonnes, Gt). This indicates that 82% to 87% of cement utilized during the last century is still in use. On a per capita basis, this is equivalent to 14.3 to 15.0 tonnes of in-use cement stock per person. The in-use cement stock per capita has doubled over the last 50 years, although the rate of growth has slowed.

[1]  Thomas Kelly,et al.  CRUSHED CEMENT CONCRETE SUBSTITUTION FOR CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES - A MATERIALS FLOW ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[2]  M. T. Melo,et al.  Statistical analysis of metal scrap generation: the case of aluminium in Germany , 1999 .

[3]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Dynamic substance flow analysis: the delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden , 2000 .

[4]  Hendrik G. van Oss,et al.  Cement Manufacture and the Environment Part II: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities , 2003 .

[5]  T. Stockdale,et al.  Population estimates. , 2004, Health statistics quarterly.

[6]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Plastics streams in Germany : an analysis of production, consumption and waste generation , 1998 .

[7]  Robert J. Klee,et al.  Getting serious about sustainability. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  J. M. van Noortwijk,et al.  The use of lifetime distributions in bridge maintenance and replacement modelling , 2004 .

[9]  Peter Michaelis,et al.  Material and energy flow through the UK iron and steel sector. Part 1: 1954–1994 , 2000 .

[10]  James R. Cohen,et al.  Abandoned housing: Exploring lessons from baltimore , 2001 .

[11]  T E Graedel,et al.  Copper mines above and below the ground. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  The contemporary European copper cycle: 1 year stocks and flows , 2002 .

[13]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Analysis of the paper and wood flow in The Netherlands , 2000 .

[14]  Peter Michaelis,et al.  Material and energy flow through the UK iron and steel sector , 2000 .

[15]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Assessment of the plastic flows in The Netherlands using STREAMS , 2000 .

[16]  Robert B. Gordon,et al.  The Multilevel Cycle of Anthropogenic Zinc , 2005 .

[17]  P. Baccini,et al.  Sustainable metal management exemplified by copper in the USA , 1999 .

[18]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Reliability of Structures , 2000 .

[19]  Daniel B. Müller,et al.  Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows—Case study for housing in The Netherlands , 2006 .

[20]  J Vannoortwijk The use of lifetime distributions in bridge maintenance and replacement modelling , 2004 .

[21]  Viveka Palm,et al.  Lead and zinc flows from technosphere to biosphere in a city region , 1996 .

[22]  P. Brunner,et al.  Metabolism of the Anthroposphere , 1991 .

[23]  T. Graedel,et al.  Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis , 2005 .

[24]  Claus Pade,et al.  The CO2 Uptake of Concrete in a 100 Year Perspective , 2007 .

[25]  Ester van der Voet,et al.  Dynamic stock modelling: A method for the identification and estimation of future waste streams and emissions based on past production and product stock characteristics , 2005 .

[26]  A. Horvath CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[27]  D. Schrank,et al.  THE 2004 URBAN MOBILITY REPORT , 2002 .

[28]  Lorie A. Wagner Materials in the economy--material flows, scarcity, and the environment , 2002 .

[29]  Hendrik G. van Oss,et al.  Cement Manufacture and the Environment: Part I: Chemistry and Technology , 2002 .

[30]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  The contemporary European copper cycle: The characterization of technological copper cycles , 2002 .

[31]  Robert J. Klee,et al.  Multilevel cycle of anthropogenic copper. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Bo Bergbäck,et al.  Century Perspective of Heavy Metal Use in Urban Areas. A Case Study in Stockholm , 2001 .

[33]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Evaluation of risks of metal flows and accumulation in economy and environment , 1999 .