Patient Innovation: An Analysis of Patients' Designs of Digital Technology Support for Everyday Living with Diabetes

The aim of this paper is to identify characteristics of patients' contributions to innovation in health information technology (HIT). The paper outlines a theoretical definition of patient innovation and presents an analysis of four digital prototypes and 22 low-fidelity mock-ups designed by people affected by the chronic illness diabetes mellitus. Seventeen families (a total of 60 people) with one or more diabetic family members participated in design activities in a four-year research project focused on the design of digital support for everyday living with diabetes. Our analysis documented the originality of the analysed patient designs and identified three characteristics of patients' designs: socio-technical networks, objects with associated personal meanings and technology supporting the expression of identity. The paper concludes that patient innovation is defined by what is perceived as new by patients and/or others within the social system of adaptation. The analysed patient designs are original (as distinct from replications of or improvements on known products), and their characteristics are innovative contributions to the social system of everyday living with diabetes (i.e. they are perceived as new to the patients in the research study). The results of the analysis contribute to the credentials of patients as key actors in HIT innovation and call for participatory approaches in health informatics.

[1]  Maja van der Velden,et al.  Colourful Privacy: Designing Visible Privacy Settings with Teenage Hospital Patients , 2014, ACHI 2014.

[2]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[3]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[4]  Ioana Literat.  Participatory Innovation , 2013 .

[5]  Pernille Bertelsen,et al.  Design for more: an ambient perspective on diabetes , 2008, PDC.

[6]  Pontus Wärnestål,et al.  Building an experience framework for a digital peer support service for children surviving from cancer , 2013, IDC.

[7]  Tariq Andersen,et al.  The participatory patient , 2010, PDC '10.

[8]  N. Oudshoorn.  Diagnosis at a distance: the invisible work of patients and healthcare professionals in cardiac telemonitoring technology. , 2008, Sociology of health & illness.

[9]  Anne Marie Kanstrup,et al.  A Living Laboratory Exploring Mobile Support for Everyday Life with Diabetes , 2010, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[10]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in System Design , 1992, Design at Work.

[11]  Mike Wu,et al.  Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia , 2004, PDC 04.

[12]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[13]  Anne Marie Kanstrup,et al.  A small matter of design: an analysis of end users as designers , 2012, PDC '12.

[14]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Design and Order in Everyday Life , 1991 .

[15]  Jeffery D. Higginbotham,et al.  Design Meets Disability , 2009 .

[16]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[17]  P. Ehn,et al.  Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements , 2012 .

[18]  Thomas Ryberg,et al.  Making chocolate-covered broccoli: designing a mobile learning game about food for young people with diabetes , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[19]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design , 2012, PDC '12.

[20]  James G. McDaniel.  Advances in Information Technology and Communication in Health , 2009 .

[21]  E. Lindsey.  Health within illness: experiences of chronically ill/disabled people. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[23]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  “Not all my friends need to know”: a qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Users' Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2006 .

[25]  Britt Östlund,et al.  Laggards as Innovators? Old Users as Designers of New Services & Service Systems. , 2011 .

[26]  Suzanne Prior,et al.  HCI methods for including adults with disabilities in the design of CHAMPION , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[28]  Jorgen P. Bansler.  Systems Development Research in Scandinavia: Three Theoretical Schools , 1991, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Catalyzing social support for breast cancer patients , 2010, CHI.

[30]  Pernille Bertelsen,et al.  User Innovation Management: A Handbook , 2011 .

[31]  Charo Rodríguez,et al.  Examining the evidence of the impact of health information technology in primary care: An argument for participatory research with health professionals and patients , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[32]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition , 1982 .

[33]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.