Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models

We quantify forcing and feedbacks across available CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) by analysing simulations forced by an abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. This is the first application of the linear forcing‐feedback regression analysis of Gregory et al. (2004) to an ensemble of AOGCMs. The range of equilibrium climate sensitivity is 2.1–4.7 K. Differences in cloud feedbacks continue to be important contributors to this range. Some models show small deviations from a linear dependence of top‐of‐atmosphere radiative fluxes on global surface temperature change. We show that this phenomenon largely arises from shortwave cloud radiative effects over the ocean and is consistent with independent estimates of forcing using fixed sea‐surface temperature methods. We suggest that future research should focus more on understanding transient climate change, including any time‐scale dependence of the forcing and/or feedback, rather than on the equilibrium response to large instantaneous forcing.

[1]  Chao Li,et al.  Deep-ocean heat uptake and equilibrium climate response , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[2]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[3]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Fast and slow timescales in the tropical low-cloud response to increasing CO2 in two climate models , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[4]  Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review , 2012, Surveys in Geophysics.

[5]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A step‐response simple climate model to reconstruct and interpret AOGCM projections , 2011 .

[6]  Isaac M. Held,et al.  Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change , 2010 .

[7]  T. Delworth,et al.  Probing the Fast and Slow Components of Global Warming by Returning Abruptly to Preindustrial Forcing , 2010 .

[8]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes , 2008 .

[9]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  Time Variation of Effective Climate Sensitivity in GCMs , 2008 .

[10]  Brian J. Soden,et al.  Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels , 2008 .

[11]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  CO2 forcing induces semi‐direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations , 2008 .

[12]  M. Webb,et al.  Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing , 2008 .

[13]  Jeffrey T. Kiehl,et al.  Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity , 2007 .

[14]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[15]  L. K. Gohar,et al.  Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernme , 2006 .

[16]  Michel Crucifix,et al.  The new hadley centre climate model (HadGEM1) : Evaluation of coupled simulations , 2006 .

[17]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Global mean cloud feedbacks in idealized climate change experiments , 2006 .

[18]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[19]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[20]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[21]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms , 2003 .

[22]  G. Boer,et al.  Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity , 2003 .

[23]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The time‐dependence of climate sensitivity , 2000 .