Joint Cost Estimation Approach for Service Provider Legacy Network Migration to Unified Software Defined IPv6 Network

Service providers world-wide are facing challenges of network operations, management, security, quality of service and address deficiency problem while the current world network still run with the existing legacy system. The issues of address shortage including the problems of legacy IPv4 address have been resolved with the advancement on IPv6 addresses. Similarly the increasing complexities of networking management have also been addressed by the advancement on Software Defined Network (SDN). For the future sustainability, service providers have to migrate their existing network to newer technologies. This requires upgrades on or replacement of existing networking devices that are operating on real time. But the lack of sufficient cost, technical human resources and suitable migration plan are becoming the major challenges for the fairly sustained service providers to migrate their existing network into next generation programmable network. SDN and IPv6 are the two new paradigms in networking operation and management that jointly after migration addresses all the existing issues of current networking system. In this paper, we present a greedy algorithm to identify the migration cost of network devices in the optimal path based on customer demand for incremental adoption of SDN enabled IPv6 network. We justify that a unified migration approach to SDN and IPv6 network would help to reduce the total cost of migration. We also verify that sequence of migration considering customer demand and cost constraints give the good estimation for unified migration to Software Defined IPv6 (SoDIP6) network.

[1]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Economic Evaluation Model for International Standardization of Correlated Technologies , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  Jun Bi,et al.  OpenRouteFlow: Enable Legacy Router as a Software-Defined Routing Service for Hybrid SDN , 2015, 2015 24th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).

[3]  Guido Appenzeller,et al.  Maturing of OpenFlow and Software-defined Networking through deployments , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[4]  Konstantinos Poularakis,et al.  One step at a time: Optimizing SDN upgrades in ISP networks , 2017, IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Panopticon: Reaping the Benefits of Incremental SDN Deployment in Enterprise Networks , 2014, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[6]  Admela Jukan,et al.  A Techno-economic Analysis of Network Migration to Software-Defined Networking , 2013, ArXiv.

[7]  Chris Metz,et al.  Transition from IPv4 to IPv6: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Paul Göransson Chapter 8 – SDN in the Data Center , 2017 .

[9]  Laurent Vanbever,et al.  Central Control Over Distributed Routing , 2015, Comput. Commun. Rev..

[10]  Admela Jukan,et al.  Study of Network Migration to New Technologies Using Agent-Based Modeling Techniques , 2013, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[11]  Peng Qin,et al.  Enabling network innovation in data center networks with software defined networking: A survey , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[12]  Fulvio Risso,et al.  Transition from IPv 4 to IPv 6 , 2017 .

[13]  Steven Izzo,et al.  How will NFV/SDN transform service provider opex? , 2015, IEEE Network.