PATTERNS OF GENDER DIFFERENCES ON MATHEMATICS ITEMS ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST

Gender differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) persist. To add to our understanding of these differences, we systematically examined differential item functioning (DIF) on six forms of the SAT in order to identify relative strengths and weaknesses for male and female students associated with three general areas: the points being tested, the format in which the test items are presented, and the subject matter in which the test items are embedded. In each set of comparisons, the DIF procedure matches male and female students on the basis of overall mathematics score on the test and then identifies test items on which groups with the same total score perform differently. Results suggest that there are identifiable patterns of gender differences in how male and female students arrive at their total scores. These differences have implications for test developers, policymakers, and teachers of mathematics.

[1]  S. T. Carlton,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING ON THE SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TEST: GENDER AND MAJORITY/MINORITY GROUP COMPARISONS , 1992 .

[2]  H. Wainer,et al.  Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. , 1992 .

[3]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[4]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Effects of High School Coursework and Time on SAT Scores. , 1990 .

[5]  Aurelia E. Skiba Reviewing an Old Subject: Math Anxiety. , 1990 .

[6]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  M. Linn,et al.  Gender, Mathematics, and Science , 1989 .

[8]  Lynn Friedman,et al.  Mathematics and the Gender Gap: A Met-Analysis of Recent Studies on Sex Differences in Mathematical Tasks , 1989 .

[9]  C. N. Jacklin,et al.  Female and male: issues of gender. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[10]  C. Benbow Some of the pathological assumptions in the sciences of gender , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. , 1988 .

[12]  Gender‐Based Differential Item Performance in Mathematics Achievement Items , 1987 .

[13]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[14]  P. Caplan,et al.  Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. , 1985, The American psychologist.

[15]  Solomon Arbeiter,et al.  Profiles, College-Bound Seniors, 1985. , 1984 .

[16]  The Consequences of Sex Bias in the Content of Major Achievement Test Batteries. , 1979 .

[17]  E. Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors , 1977 .