Lesion Detection in Dynamic FDG-PET Using Matched Subspace Detection

We describe a matched subspace detection algorithm to assist in the detection of small tumors in dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) images. The algorithm is designed to differentiate tumors from background using the time activity curves (TACs) that characterize the uptake of PET tracers. TACs are modeled using linear subspaces with additive Gaussian noise. Using TACs from a primary tumor region of interest (ROI) and one or more background ROIs, each identified by a human observer, two linear subspaces are identified. Applying a matched subspace detector to these identified subspaces on a voxel-by-voxel basis throughout the dynamic image produces a test statistic at each voxel which on thresholding indicates potential locations of secondary or metastatic tumors. The detector is derived for three cases: using a single TAC with white noise of unknown variance, using a single TAC with known noise covariance, and detection using multiple TACs within a small ROI with known noise covariance. The noise covariance is estimated for the reconstructed image from the observed sinogram data. To evaluate the proposed method, a simulation-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study for dynamic PET tumor detection is designed. The detector uses a dynamic sequence of frame-by-frame 2-D reconstructions as input. We compare the performance of the subspace detectors with that of a Hotelling observer applied to a single frame image and of the Patlak method applied to the dynamic data. We also show examples of the application of each detection approach to clinical PET data from a breast cancer patient with metastatic disease.

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  L. Scharf,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  The Use of Spectral Analysis to Determine Regional Cerebral Glucose Utilization with Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose: Theory, Implementation, and Optimization Procedures , 1994, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[6]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[7]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  Segmentation of dynamic PET or fMRI images based on a similarity metric , 2003 .

[8]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Linear discriminants and image quality , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  M. Phelps,et al.  Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Björn E. Ottersten,et al.  Sensor array processing based on subspace fitting , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  D. Feng,et al.  Segmentation of dynamic PET images using cluster analysis , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[12]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  A new method of computer-aided feature identification for lesion detection in PET-FDG dynamic study , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[13]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Matched subspace detectors , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Theoretical study of lesion detectability of MAP reconstruction using computer observers , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  E. J. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Local Cerebral Blood Flow in Humans by Positron Computed Tomography and 15O-Water , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  J. Bading Computer-Aided Lesion Detection with Statistical Model-Based Features in PET Images , 1997 .

[18]  A. Celler,et al.  The use of image morphing to improve the detection of tumors in emission imaging , 1998 .

[19]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[20]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  PET and [18F]-FDG in oncology: a clinical update. , 1996, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[22]  Yun Zhou,et al.  Spatially-coordinated regression for image-wise model fitting to dynamic PET data for generating par , 1998 .

[23]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Pathological lesion detection in 3D dynamic PET images using asymmetry , 2003, 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003.Proceedings..

[25]  O. Muzik,et al.  A novel computerized approach to enhancing lung tumor detection in whole-body PET images , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Houston,et al.  A quantitative comparison of some FADS methods in renal dynamic studies using simulated and phantom data. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  S. Shousha,et al.  Quantification of cellular proliferation in tumor and normal tissues of patients with breast cancer by [18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography imaging: evaluation of analytical methods. , 2005, Cancer research.

[29]  T. Jones,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[30]  J. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[31]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio tests for complex fMRI data: a Simulation study , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  D. Barber The use of principal components in the quantitative analysis of gamma camera dynamic studies. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  D C Barber,et al.  Factor analysis of dynamic function studies using a priori physiological information. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Noninvasive determination of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose in man. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[35]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Activation detection in functional MRI using subspace modeling and maximum likelihood estimation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  R. Leahy,et al.  Fully 3 D Bayesian Image Reconstruction for the ECAT EXACT HR + 1 , 1998 .

[37]  Finbarr O'Sullivan,et al.  Use of ridge regression for improved estimation of kinetic constants from PET data , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medical Imaging , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[39]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[40]  A. Alavi,et al.  Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Peter Herscovitch,et al.  An approximation formula for the variance of PET region-of-interest values , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[42]  G. Kontaxakis,et al.  Performance evaluation of principal component analysis in dynamic FDG-PET studies of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[43]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[44]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[45]  Yun Zhou,et al.  DYNAMIC PET DATA FOR GENERATING PARAMETRIC IMAGESl , 1998 .

[46]  F. Pedersen,et al.  Principal component analysis of dynamic positron emission tomography images , 1994, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  Johan Vansteenkiste,et al.  The role of PET scan in diagnosis, staging, and management of non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The oncologist.

[48]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Accurate estimation of the fisher information matrix for the PET image reconstruction problem , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.