Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks

Document S1. Supplemental Experimental ProceduresxDownload (.09 MB ) Document S1. Supplemental Experimental Procedures

[1]  G. Horn,et al.  Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  R. Blake.  Cats Perceive Biological Motion , 1993 .

[3]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[4]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[5]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[6]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Evolution of Cognition , 2001 .

[7]  G. Horn,et al.  Predispositions and preferences. Effects on imprinting of lesions to the chick brain , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  T. Shipley.  The Effect of Object and Event Orientation on Perception of Biological Motion , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  S. Lea,et al.  Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[11]  S. Sumi.  Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[12]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Inverted gravity, not inverted shape impairs biological motion perception , 2004 .

[14]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[16]  Predispositions and preferences , 1985 .