Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality.

Self-sacrificing behavior of the leader and the extent to which the leader is representative of the group (i.e., group prototypical) are proposed to interact to influence leadership effectiveness. The authors expected self-sacrificing leaders to be considered more effective and to be able to push subordinates to a higher performance level than non-self-sacrificing leaders, and these effects were expected to be more pronounced for less prototypical leaders than for more prototypical leaders. The results of a laboratory experiment showed that, as expected, productivity levels, effectiveness ratings, and perceived leader group-orientedness and charisma were positively affected by leader self-sacrifice, especially when leader prototypicality was low. The main results were replicated in a scenario experiment and 2 surveys.

[1]  D. Kahneman A Psychological Perspective on Economics , 2003 .

[2]  Michael B. Arthur,et al.  The rhetoric of charismatic leadership: A theoretical extension, a case study, and implications for research , 1994 .

[3]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Social Identity and Leadership Processes in Groups , 2003 .

[4]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[5]  David De Cremer,et al.  Intergroup and Intragroup Aspects of Leadership in Social Dilemmas: A Relational Model of Cooperation , 2002 .

[6]  C. Judd,et al.  Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  David De Cremer,et al.  Charismatic Leadership and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Matter of Transforming Motives?1 , 2002 .

[8]  H. Tajfel Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[9]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Effects of Transformational Leadership Training on Attitudinal and Financial Outcomes: A Field Experiment , 1996 .

[10]  Florence Stinglhamber,et al.  Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Yeon Choi,et al.  The model of followers' responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test , 1999 .

[12]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups. , 1997 .

[13]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Information seeking and reciprocity: a transformational analysis , 2003 .

[14]  R. J. House,et al.  Dynamics of charismatic leadership: a process theory, simulation model, and tests , 2001 .

[15]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. , 1989 .

[16]  James G. Hunt,et al.  The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership , 1999 .

[17]  E. Dijk,et al.  Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality , 2000 .

[18]  Yeon Choi,et al.  On the leadership function of self-sacrifice , 1998 .

[19]  Kevin B. Lowe,et al.  Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the mlq literature , 1996 .

[20]  B. Avolio,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2002 .

[21]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. , 1993 .

[22]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing , 1994 .

[24]  A. Carrón,et al.  Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. , 1997 .

[25]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[26]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance , 2002 .

[27]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Basic group processes , 1983 .

[28]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[29]  J. C. Wofford,et al.  Laboratory research on charismatic leadership , 1999 .

[30]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[31]  B. Bass LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[32]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[33]  R. Spears,et al.  A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[34]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[35]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings , 1987 .

[36]  Edwin P. Hollander,et al.  Leadership, followership, self, and others. , 1992 .

[37]  Roya Ayman,et al.  Leadership theory and research : perspectives and directions , 1993 .

[38]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. , 1998 .

[39]  C. L. Cox,et al.  Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance , 1999 .

[41]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Charismatic leadership in organizations , 1998 .

[42]  M. Hogg,et al.  A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2003 .

[43]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[44]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[45]  M. Hogg,et al.  Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organizations , 2004 .

[46]  S. Reicher,et al.  On the Science of the Art of Leadership , 2003 .

[47]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Contrasting different philosophies of leader motivation: Altruism versus egoism , 2002 .

[48]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[49]  D. Cremer,et al.  How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. , 2002 .

[50]  E P HOLLANDER,et al.  Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. , 1958, Psychological review.

[51]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[52]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[53]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[54]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[55]  Jay A. Conger,et al.  Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider's perspective on these developing streams of research , 1999 .

[56]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[57]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership , 1999 .

[58]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations , 1983 .

[59]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[60]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[61]  Scott Millard,et al.  The Columbia World of Quotations , 2004 .

[62]  M. Evans A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis , 1985 .

[63]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Leadership, Identity, and Influence: Relational concerns in the use of influence tactics , 2003 .

[64]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[65]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[66]  H. Weiss,et al.  The effect of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity , 2001 .

[68]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[69]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[70]  James G. Hunt,et al.  Leadership: The Cutting Edge. , 1979 .

[71]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[72]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[73]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Self-Categorization and Leadership: Effects of Group Prototypicality and Leader Stereotypicality , 1997 .

[74]  M. Platow,et al.  A Social Identity Analysis of Leadership Endorsement: The Effects of Leader Ingroup Prototypicality and Distributive Intergroup Fairness , 2001 .

[75]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[76]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity , 2001 .