Evaluation Plan for an Airport Surface-Operation Automation Concept

The predicted growth in air travel demands capacity enhancement in the National Airspace System, and congestion at key airports has been recognized as one of the most prominent problem areas. With flights operating at limits dictated by operational requirements associated with current airport configurations, airport expansion plans involving addition of new runways and taxiways are being realized to increase the airports’ capacities. However, the expansion plans necessarily increase the complexity of the airport configurations, which tends to penalize the efficiency of the system, partially offsetting the capacity-related benefits of the investments. The Surface Operation Automation Research (SOAR) concept has been proposed as a collaborative concept to provide automation for surface-traffic management and the flight deck to enhance the operational efficiency in complex airport environments, thus reversing the penalties to fully realize the capacity benefits sought by the airport expansion plans. Development and evaluation of the SOAR concept is being pursued in a 5-year program, and this paper describes the experiments being designed for an initial evaluation during the second year of this program.

[1]  B. J. Glass.  AUTOMATED DATA EXCHANGE AND FUSION FOR AIRPORT SURFACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[2]  C. Evers,et al.  Loop technology (LOT) as an alternative surface surveillance system , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[3]  Jimmy Krozel,et al.  Improved Taxi Prediction Algorithms for the Surface Management System , 2002 .

[4]  Victor H. L. Cheng,et al.  A study of aircraft taxi performance for enhancing airport surface traffic control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[5]  S. Atkins,et al.  Functionalities, displays, and concept of use for the surface management system [ATC] , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[6]  Richard E. Zelenka,et al.  ATC / AIR CARRIER COLLABORATIVE ARRIVAL PLANNING , 1998 .

[7]  M Gaier Eric,et al.  A Method for Forecasting the Commercial Air Traffic Schedule in the Future , 1999 .

[8]  V.H.L. Cheng.  Collaborative automation systems for enhancing airport surface traffic efficiency and safety , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[9]  A. Smith,et al.  Positive identification of aircraft on surface movement areas: results of FAA trials , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[10]  V. Capezzuto,et al.  Runway incursion reduction program (RIRP) surveillance system, NASA/FAA Atlanta demonstration , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[11]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Observations of Departure Processes at Logan Airport to Support the Development of Departure Planning Tools , 1999 .

[12]  Harry N. Swenson,et al.  Design and Operational Evaluation of the Traffic Management Advisor at the Ft. Worth Air Route Traffic Control Center , 1997 .

[13]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Design of Center-TRACON Automation System , 1993 .

[14]  A Lee David,et al.  The Aviation System Analysis Capability Airport Capacity and Delay Models , 1998 .

[15]  Victor Cheng.  Airport Surface Operation Collaborative Automation Concept , 2003 .

[16]  D. S. Hicok,et al.  Application of ADS-B for airport surface surveillance , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[17]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  DESIGN CONCEPT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE EXPEDITE DEPARTURE PATH (EDP) , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas J. Davis,et al.  The Final Approach Spacing Tool , 1994 .

[19]  Matthew Blake,et al.  Fast-Time NAS Simulation System for Analysis of Advanced ATM Concepts , 2002 .

[20]  L. Cheng.  AUTOMATION TOOLS FOR ENHANCING GROUND-OPERATION SITUATION AWARENESS AND FLOW EFFICIENCY , 2002 .

[21]  Vikram Manikonda,et al.  FAST -TIME SIMULATION SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF ADVANCED AIR TRANSPORTATION CONCEPTS , 2002 .