A Bayesian Framework for Figure-Ground Interpretation

Figure/ground assignment, in which the visual image is divided into nearer (figural) and farther (ground) surfaces, is an essential step in visual processing, but its underlying computational mechanisms are poorly understood. Figural assignment (often referred to as border ownership) can vary along a contour, suggesting a spatially distributed process whereby local and global cues are combined to yield local estimates of border ownership. In this paper we model figure/ground estimation in a Bayesian belief network, attempting to capture the propagation of border ownership across the image as local cues (contour curvature and T-junctions) interact with more global cues to yield a figure/ground assignment. Our network includes as a nonlocal factor skeletal (medial axis) structure, under the hypothesis that medial structure "draws" border ownership so that borders are owned by the skeletal hypothesis that best explains them. We also briefly present a psychophysical experiment in which we measured local border ownership along a contour at various distances from an inducing cue (a T-junction). Both the human subjects and the network show similar patterns of performance, converging rapidly to a similar pattern of spatial variation in border ownership along contours.

[1]  Mary Henle,et al.  Vision and artifact , 1977 .

[2]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Globally inconsistent figure/ground relations induced by a negative part. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[4]  A. Brookes,et al.  The Concave Cusp as a Determiner of Figure—Ground , 1988, Perception.

[5]  S. Zucker,et al.  Endstopping and curvature , 1989, Vision Research.

[6]  E. Peterhans,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a neural mechanism defining depth order and contrast polarity at illusory contours , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Mary A Peterson,et al.  Inhibitory competition between shape properties in figure-ground perception. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Border Ownership from Intracortical Interactions in Visual Area V2 , 2005, Neuron.

[9]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  The role of vertical mirror symmetry in visual shape detection. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[10]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Loopy Belief Propagation for Approximate Inference: An Empirical Study , 1999, UAI.

[12]  C. Strecha,et al.  Surface construction by a 2-D differentiation-integration process: a neurocomputational model for perceived border ownership, depth, and lightness in Kanizsa figures. , 2010, Psychological review.

[13]  Olaf Kübler,et al.  Hierarchic Voronoi skeletons , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  A neural model of figure-ground organization. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[17]  Manish Singh,et al.  Bayesian estimation of the shape skeleton , 2010 .

[18]  Yair Weiss,et al.  Interpreting Images by Propagating Bayesian Beliefs , 1996, NIPS.