The Impact of Reader Skill on Phonological processing in visual Word Recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Yasushi Hino,et al. Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .
[2] K E Stanovich,et al. Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[3] Dan Chateau,et al. Exposure to print and word recognition processes , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[4] J. Baron,et al. Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .
[5] Stephen J. Lupker,et al. The Effects of Word Frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji Words in Naming and Lexical Decision: Can the Dual-Route Model Save the Lexical-Selection Account? , 1998 .
[6] Phonological Recoding in Lexical Decision: the Influence of Pseudohomophones , 1983 .
[7] Matthew Flatt,et al. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .
[8] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[9] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. The basis of consistency effects in word naming , 1990 .
[10] R Frost,et al. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[11] D Jared,et al. Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[12] G Underwood,et al. Orthographic vs. phonological irregularity in lexical decision , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[13] S. Andrews. Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? , 1982 .
[14] A. Parkin. Phonological recoding in lexical decision: Effects of spelling-to-sound regularity depend on how regularity is defined , 1982, Memory & cognition.
[15] D. Balota,et al. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .
[16] G O Stone,et al. Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] James L. McClelland,et al. Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .
[18] G. Stone,et al. Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .
[19] G C Van Orden,et al. Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] M. Taft,et al. Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .
[21] K. Stanovich,et al. Exposure to print and orthographic processing. , 1989 .
[22] Lucia Colombo,et al. Interacting sources of information in word naming: a study of individual differences , 1994 .
[23] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[24] Yasushi Hino,et al. Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000 .
[25] C M Herdman,et al. Imageability effects in word naming: an individual differences analysis. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[26] Derek Besner,et al. Phonological Encoding in the Lexical Decision Task , 1979 .
[27] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[28] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[29] G. Waters,et al. Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks , 1984, Memory & cognition.
[30] Mark S. Seidenberg. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.
[31] Debra Jared,et al. Spelling-Sound Consistency Affects the Naming of High-Frequency Words , 1997 .
[32] S. Lupker,et al. Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[34] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Word naming and memory load: Still searching for an individual differences explanation. , 1998 .
[35] M Coltheart,et al. Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[36] I. Berent. Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[37] D. Balota,et al. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] K Rayner,et al. The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[39] J. Ziegler,et al. The Feedback Consistency Effect in Lexical Decision and Naming , 1997 .
[40] S. Lupker,et al. Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[41] Alan H. Kawamoto,et al. Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .
[42] D. Pecher,et al. Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[43] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .
[44] H. Rubenstein,et al. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .
[45] L. Katz,et al. Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] Derek Besner,et al. Phonological recoding and lexical access , 1978 .
[47] Keith E. Stanovich,et al. Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition , 1978 .