Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology

The authors offer a framework for drawing-to-learn that defines drawing, categorizes the reasons for using drawing in the biology classroom, and outlines a number of teaching interventions to promote visual model-based reasoning in biology. A Blooming tool for drawing exercises and other suggestions for assessment are also provided.

[1]  Anne Tweed,et al.  Hard-To-Teach Biology Concepts: A Framework to Deepen Student Understanding , 2009 .

[2]  Jonas Schmitt,et al.  Understanding By Design , 2016 .

[3]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[4]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Understanding phylogenies in biology: the influence of a Gestalt Perceptual Principle. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[6]  J. Clement,et al.  Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. , 1999 .

[7]  Wouter R. van Joolingen,et al.  Students' reasoning during modeling in an inquiry learning environment , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  Shaaron Ainsworth.  How Should We Evaluate Complex Multimedia Environments? , .

[10]  John W. Parks,et al.  How Accurate Is Peer Grading? , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[11]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Drawing to Learn in Science , 2011, Science.

[12]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction , 2014 .

[13]  Sacit Köse,et al.  Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method , 2008 .

[14]  Peggy Brickman,et al.  Best Practices for Measuring Students’ Attitudes toward Learning Science , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[15]  Mildred A. Hoover,et al.  Prevalence of blood circulation misconceptions among prospective elementary teachers. , 2005, Advances in physiology education.

[16]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[18]  Janice L. Anderson,et al.  Understanding Early Elementary Children's Conceptual Knowledge of Plant Structure and Function through Drawings , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  Clarissa Dirks,et al.  Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  T. Eddinger,et al.  Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  Peter L. Brooks,et al.  Visualizing data , 1997 .

[22]  Julie A. Reynolds,et al.  Writing-to-Learn in Undergraduate Science Education: A Community-Based, Conceptually Driven Approach , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[23]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Using Drawing Strategically: Drawing Activities Make Life Science Meaningful to Third- and Fourth-Grade Students , 2008 .

[24]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Seventh grade students' mental models of the greenhouse effect , 2011 .

[25]  Hermann G. Ebner,et al.  Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation , 2003 .

[26]  D. Ellis.  Visual explanations: Images and quantities , 1997 .

[27]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[28]  Perry D. Klein.  Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn , 1999 .

[29]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[30]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Model building for conceptual change , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[32]  William Stow.  Concept Mapping: A Tool for Self-Assessment?. , 1997 .

[33]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text , 2006 .

[34]  D. Allen,et al.  Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course design. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[35]  Ann C.H. Kindfield,et al.  Biology Diagrams: Tools to Think With , 1994 .

[36]  David Mioduser,et al.  Students' Construction of Structured Knowledge Representations. , 1995 .

[37]  Fatma Taskin Ekici,et al.  Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis. , 2007 .

[38]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[39]  Emmanuel Manalo,et al.  Task‐Related Factors that Influence the Spontaneous Use of Diagrams in Math Word Problems , 2012 .

[40]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[41]  Dan Roam,et al.  The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures , 2008 .

[42]  Tammy M. Long,et al.  Analyzing change in students' gene-to-evolution models in college-level introductory biology , 2013 .

[43]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education , 2014, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[44]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems , 2007 .

[45]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool* , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[46]  Ayalew Tefferi,et al.  Envisioning Science: The Design and Craft of the Science Image , 2004 .

[47]  Julie Libarkin,et al.  The Utility of Writing Assignments in Undergraduate Bioscience , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[48]  Lyn Baldwin,et al.  Art Instruction in the Botany Lab: A Collaborative Approach. , 2010 .

[49]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gap , 2010, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[50]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Seventh grade students' conceptions of global warming and climate change , 2009 .

[52]  T. Jong.  Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[53]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology , 1995 .

[54]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[55]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[56]  H. Pashler,et al.  Learning styles: where’s the evidence? , 2012, Medical education.

[57]  Matthew Fifolt,et al.  The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures , 2011 .

[58]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education , 2013 .

[59]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  An Examination of the Line Graphing Ability of Students in Grades Seven Through Twelve , 1986 .

[60]  Ellen F. Potter,et al.  Using Descriptive Drawings as a Conceptual Change Strategy in Elementary Science , 2003 .

[61]  Chris Picone,et al.  Assessing gains in undergraduate students' abilities to analyze graphical data , 2007 .

[62]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Laura R. Novick.  The Importance of Both Diagrammatic Conventions and Domain-Specific Knowledge for Diagram Literacy in Science: The Hierarchy as an Illustrative Case , 2006, Diagrams.

[64]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visualization : theory and practice in science education , 2008 .

[65]  Gillian Rose,et al.  Visual methodologies : an introduction to researching with visual materials , 2011 .

[66]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[67]  Musa Dikmenli,et al.  Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis , 2010 .

[68]  David A. Baum,et al.  Phylogenics & Tree-Thinking , 2008 .

[69]  Sonia Stephens.  From Tree to Map: Using Cognitive Learning Theory to Suggest Alternative Ways to Visualize Macroevolution , 2012, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[70]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[71]  Shaaron Ainsworth.  How Should We Evaluate Multimedia Learning Environments , 2008 .

[72]  Kimberly D Tanner,et al.  Talking to learn: why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[73]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[74]  Alessandro Guida,et al.  2011 space odyssey: spatialization as a mechanism to code order allows a close encounter between memory expertise and classic immediate memory studies , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[75]  Edward R. Tufte.  Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative , 1997 .

[76]  R. Mayer,et al.  Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. , 2010 .

[77]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time , 2011 .

[78]  K. Tanner,et al.  Feature Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning Considering the Role of Affect in Learning : Monitoring Students ’ Self-Efficacy , Sense of Belonging , and Science Identity , 2014 .

[79]  Scott Freeman,et al.  How should we teach tree-thinking? An experimental test of two hypotheses , 2013, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[80]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  Yuri Uesaka,et al.  What kinds of perceptions and daily learning behaviors promote students' use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? , 2007 .

[82]  Neal Lerner,et al.  Drawing to Learn Science: Legacies of Agassiz , 2007 .

[83]  M. Hegarty.  The Role of Spatial Thinking in Undergraduate Science Education , 2011 .

[84]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[85]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[86]  Nadaleen Tempelman-Kluit.  Multimedia Learning Theories and Online Instruction , 2006 .

[87]  James L. Mohler,et al.  An Instructional Strategy for Pictorial Drawing. , 2007 .

[88]  S. A. Cohen,et al.  Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet , 1987 .

[89]  I. Kinchin,et al.  Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education , 2008 .

[90]  David F. Treagust,et al.  The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level , 2007 .

[91]  Sid Bourke,et al.  Assessing affective characteristics in the schools , 1981 .

[92]  Dina L. Newman,et al.  DNA → RNA: What Do Students Think the Arrow Means? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[93]  R. Dehaan.  Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[94]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[95]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design , 1996 .

[96]  Betty Edwards,et al.  The new drawing on the right side of the brain workbook : guided practice in the five basic skills of drawing , 1979 .

[97]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought , 2000 .

[98]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[99]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models in Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[100]  P. V. Meter,et al.  The Promise and Practice of Learner-Generated Drawing: Literature Review and Synthesis , 2005 .

[101]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[102]  David Hyerle.  A Field Guide to Using Visual Tools , 2000 .

[103]  E. Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1984, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[104]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Interpreting Hierarchical Structure: Evidence from Cladograms in Biology , 2006, Diagrams.

[105]  T. R. Black,et al.  Attitudes towards sketching and drawing and the relationship with spatial visualisation ability in engineering students , 2002 .

[106]  Richard J. T. Wingate,et al.  Using Drawings of the Brain Cell to Exhibit Expertise in Neuroscience: Exploring the Boundaries of Experimental Culture , 2013 .

[107]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[108]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams? , 2009 .

[109]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[110]  Barbara Lom,et al.  More than a picture: helping undergraduates learn to communicate through scientific images. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.