A theoretical framework for multimedia resources: A case from science education

The availability and purported strengths of information and communication technology has increased the applications of multimedia resources in higher education. Introduction of multimedia resources into courses brings with it problems from a number of perspectives. What constitutes good quality resource material? Is it effective as a learning tool? How credible is the content in terms of professional requirements? These are important questions that teacher educators confront in enabling them to discern good quality material and to contribute to the development of further resources. Our premise is that these questions need to be answered by a consideration of research into the efficacy of multimedia teaching resources. Considerable research has been conducted over the last decade, which has identified certain principles of effective learning. These principles are important to consider in the development of multimedia resources. In this paper we report on the production of a multimedia resource involving CDROMs, Videos and a Website to support the learning of science teaching by primary preservice teachers. The development of these resources was informed by a generative theory of multimedia learning. We describe the features of the multimedia resources that were produced and how these resources were tested for effectiveness as learning tools and as authentic representations of professional practice.

[1]  R. Kozma Learning with Media , 1991 .

[2]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[3]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[4]  A. Ciardiello,et al.  Did You Ask a Good Question Today? Alternative Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies. , 1998 .

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[7]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Educational Criticism as a form of Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[8]  Luann K. Stemler,et al.  Educational characteristics of multimedia: a literature review , 1997 .

[9]  N. Vaidya,et al.  Science Teaching for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[10]  David Nicol,et al.  Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers , 1994 .

[11]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Primary Science: Past and Future Directions , 1996 .

[12]  Joan Reeves,et al.  Science and Technology in Primary Schools , 1987 .

[13]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Progression in school science curriculum: A rational prospect or a chimera? , 1994, Research in Science Education.

[14]  B. Wilson Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[15]  E. Glasersfeld Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. , 1995 .

[16]  Douglas A. Roberts,et al.  Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices , 2000 .

[17]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[18]  Greg Kearsley,et al.  Explorations in learning and instruction: The theory into practice database , 1994 .

[19]  Von Glasersfeld,et al.  A Way of Knowing and Learning , 1996 .

[20]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.