Towards Precise Metadata-set for Discovering 3D Geospatial Models in Geo-portals

Accessing 3D geospatial models, eventually at no cost and for unrestricted use, is certainly an important issue as they become popular among participatory communities, consultants, and officials. Various geo-portals, mainly established for 2D resources, have tried to provide access to existing 3D resources such as digital elevation model, LIDAR or classic topographic data. Describing the content of data, metadata is a key component of data discovery in geo-portals. An inventory of seven online geo-portals and commercial catalogues shows that the metadata referring to 3D information is very different from one geo-portal to another as well as for similar 3D resources in the same geo-portal. The inventory considered 971 data resources affiliated with elevation. 51% of them were from three geo-portals running at Canadian federal and municipal levels whose metadata resources did not consider 3D model by any definition. Regarding the remaining 49% which refer to 3D models, different definition of terms and metadata were found, resulting in confusion and misinterpretation. The overall assessment of these geo-portals clearly shows that the provided metadata do not integrate specific and common information about 3D geospatial models. Accordingly, the main objective of this research is to improve 3D geospatial model discovery in geo-portals by adding a specific metadata-set. Based on the knowledge and current practices on 3D modeling, and 3D data acquisition and management, a set of metadata is proposed to increase its suitability for 3D geospatial models. This metadata-set enables the definition of genuine classes, fields, and code-lists for a 3D metadata profile. The main structure of the proposal contains 21 metadata classes. These classes are classified in three packages as General and Complementary on contextual and structural information, and Availability on the transition from storage to delivery format. The proposed metadata set is compared with Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) metadata which is an implementation of North American Profile of ISO-19115. The comparison analyzes the two metadata against three simulated scenarios about discovering needed 3D geo-spatial datasets. Considering specific metadata about 3D geospatial models, the proposed metadata-set has six additional classes on geometric dimension, level of detail, geometric modeling, topology, and appearance information. In addition classes on data acquisition, preparation, and modeling, and physical availability have been specialized for 3D geospatial models.

[1]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[2]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Visualizing perceived spatial data quality of 3D objects within virtual globes , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[3]  N. Badler,et al.  3 D Object Modeling , 1999 .

[4]  Herna L. Viktor,et al.  Long-term digital preservation: preserving authenticity and usability of 3-D data , 2009, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[5]  J. Pouliot,et al.  3D Cadastre in the Province of Quebec: A First Experiment for the Construction of a Volumetric Representation , 2011 .

[6]  Weiyi Meng Search Engine , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[7]  Jürgen Döllner,et al.  Continuous level-of-detail modeling of buildings in 3D city models , 2005, GIS '05.

[8]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Making interoperability persistent : A 3D geo database based on CityGML , 2009 .

[9]  Hugo Ledoux,et al.  Topologically consistent 3D city models obtained by extrusion , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Marcus Apel,et al.  From 3d geomodelling systems towards 3d geoscience information systems: Data model, query functionality, and data management , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[12]  Herna L. Viktor,et al.  A Metadata Framework for Long Term Digital Preservation of 3D Data , 2010 .

[13]  Jacynthe Pouliot,et al.  3D Modeling for Mobile Augmented Reality in Unprepared Environment , 2011 .

[14]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Metadata for 3D City Models Analysis of the Applicability of the ISO 19115 Standard and Possibilities for further Amendments , 2007 .

[15]  Gilles Falquet,et al.  Towards an Integrated Visualization Of Semantically Enriched 3D City Models: An Ontology of 3D Visualization Techniques , 2012, ArXiv.

[16]  F. Penninga,et al.  3D topography: A simplicial complex-based solution in a spatial DBMS , 2008 .

[17]  Siyka Zlatanovaa,et al.  3 D GIS : CURRENT STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES , 2002 .

[18]  Nicolas S. Holliman,et al.  Integration of regional to outcrop digital data: 3D visualisation of multi-scale geological models , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[19]  C. Brenner,et al.  3D URBAN GIS FROM LASER ALTIMETER AND 2D MAP DATA , 1997 .

[20]  M. Pilouk Integrated modelling for 3D GIS , 1996 .

[21]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  The role of sub‐national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  T. H. Kolbe,et al.  The Virtual 3D City Model of Berlin-Managing, Integrating, and Communicating Complex Urban Information , 2006 .

[23]  Rene Kaiser,et al.  A 2.75 D Finite Element Model of 3D Fracture Network Systems , 2002, IMR.

[24]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  PERSPECTIVES D’UTILISATION DU CONCEPT D’ENTREPÔT DE DONNÉES POUR LES GÉORÉPERTOIRES DANS INTERNET , 1998 .

[25]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Open Building Models: Towards a Platform for Crowdsourcing Virtual 3D Cities , 2013 .

[26]  P. Neis,et al.  Towards 3 D Spatial Data Infrastructures ( 3 D-SDI ) based on open standards – experiences , results and future issues , 2007 .

[27]  Alias Abdul Rahman,et al.  3D GIS : current status on perspectives , 2002 .

[28]  Pascal Neis,et al.  Towards 3D Spatial Data Infrastructures (3D-SDI) based on open standards — experiences, results and future issues , 2008 .

[29]  Philip Levis,et al.  Unsupervised Conversion of 3D Models for Interactive Metaverses , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[30]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  A User Requirements Study of Digital 3D Models for Urban Renewal , 2010 .

[31]  Brian Evans 3D Models from the Cloud , 2012 .

[32]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[33]  Stefan Boeykens,et al.  Metadata for 3D Models. How to search in 3D Model repositories , 2008 .

[34]  Bernard Lachance,et al.  Reasoning about geological space: Coupling 3D GeoModels and topological queries as an aid to spatial data selection , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[35]  Petr Cizek,et al.  The ethics of Google Earth: crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  Vector based Mapping of Polygons on Irregular Terrain Meshes for Web 3D Map Services , 2007, WEBIST.

[37]  G. Gröger,et al.  How to Achieve Consistency for 3 D City Models Early Draft , 2011 .

[38]  Kurt Maly,et al.  Digital library framework for progressive compressed 3D models , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[39]  Zygmunt Pizlo,et al.  Navigation and Discovery of 3 D models in a CAD Repository , 2007 .

[40]  Peter van Oosterom,et al.  3D Cadastres , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[41]  Lutz Plümer,et al.  Spatial Data Infrastructure Techniques for Flexible Noise Mapping Strategies , 2006, EnviroInfo.

[42]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  A Three Step Procedure to Enrich Augmented Reality Games with CityGML 3D Semantic Modeling , 2013 .

[43]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  Fondement de la modélisation conceptuelle des bases de données géospatiales 3D , 2006, Rev. Int. Géomatique.

[44]  Martin Breunig,et al.  3D geo-database research: Retrospective and future directions , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[45]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Conceptual Requirements for the Automatic Reconstruction of Building Information Models from Uninterpreted 3D Models , 2009 .

[46]  Krzysztof Walczak,et al.  Issues in Creation, Management, Search and Presentation of Interactive 3D Content , 2012, Interactive 3D Multimedia Content.

[47]  Jürgen Döllner,et al.  High-level web service for 3D building information visualization and analysis , 2007, GIS.

[48]  S. O. Elberink,et al.  Generation and Dissemination of a National Virtual 3D City and Landscape Model for the Netherlands , 2013 .

[49]  Jakub Flotyński,et al.  Describing Semantics of 3D Web Content with RDFa , 2013 .

[50]  A. Scianna,et al.  Building 3D GIS data models using open source software , 2013 .

[51]  KesslerHolger,et al.  The capture and dissemination of integrated 3D geospatial knowledge at the British Geological Survey using GSI3D software and methodology , 2009 .

[52]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  A search engine for 3D models , 2003, TOGS.

[53]  G. Falquet,et al.  Towards semantically enriched 3D city models: an ontology-based approach , 2009 .

[54]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Implementation of a National 3D Standard : case of the Netherlands , 2013 .

[55]  C. Brenner,et al.  URBAN GIS FROM LASER ALTIMETER AND 2 D MAP DATA , 1998 .

[56]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Towards a National 3D Spatial Data Infrastructure: Case of The Netherlands , 2011 .

[57]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Representing and Exchanging 3D City Models with CityGML , 2009 .

[58]  Ben Gorte,et al.  Representation and Reconstruction of Triangular Irregular Networks with Vertical Walls , 2012 .