An Evaluation of the Use of Video Tutorials as supporting Tools for teaching Laboratory Skills in Biology

The recent developments in digital media and availability of portable digital devices have opened many possibilities for educational use. A potential application arises when teaching a particular skill relies on the accurate description of the procedure involved. Teaching molecular biology falls within this description, as it requires highly specific skills with well-defined protocols, for which small errors can lead to failure of the process. This study aimed to evaluate the use of a video tutorial during an active learning laboratory-based session on students’ competence and confidence. The study group comprised undergraduate students with minimal experience in a laboratory environment, previously identified as lacking confidence when first facing the procedures alone. Students were allocated to one of three groups which either (a) received face-to-face training and were asked to repeat the procedure alone at a later date; (b) received training and were asked to repeat the procedure alone at a later date with access to the video; or (c) did not receive training but were asked to carry out the procedure alone relying on the video. Comparisons were made between the groups in terms of their behaviour, the end result of the procedure, and their answers to a questionnaire assessing their confidence. Results suggest that a blended approach yielded the greatest success when performing the procedure alone. Moreover, the availability of the video tutorial increased students’ confidence in their own ability. Video tutorials are proposed as excellent tools as part of a blended approach to teach practical skills.

[1]  A. M. White The Process of Education , 1994 .

[2]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Yoder,et al.  Journal Abstracts , 2002 .

[4]  R. A. Ellis,et al.  Learning through inquiry: student difficulties with online course-based Material , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  Doo Hun Lim,et al.  Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[7]  Joel A Michael,et al.  Enhancing active learning in the student laboratory. , 2004, Advances in physiology education.

[8]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[9]  Helping undergraduates repair faulty mental models in the student laboratory. , 2000, Advances in physiology education.

[10]  Richard Shingles,et al.  Virtual Lab Demonstrations Improve Students’ Mastery of Basic Biology Laboratory Techniques , 2009, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[11]  John Couperthwaite,et al.  A blended approach to learning: added value and lessons learnt from students' use of computer-based materials for neurological analysis , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Karin Schwab,et al.  Toward A Theory Of Instruction , 2016 .

[13]  Farahnaz Movahedzadeh,et al.  Improving Students' Attitude Toward Science Through Blended Learning , 2011 .

[14]  Arianne M. Dantas,et al.  A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component. , 2008, Advances in physiology education.

[15]  Lawrence O. Flowers,et al.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in an Undergraduate Biology Course , 2011 .

[16]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Action research: a contradiction in terms? , 2004 .

[17]  April L. Colosimo,et al.  Library Video Tutorials to Support Large Undergraduate Labs: Will They Watch?. , 2012 .