Network structure, organizational learning culture, and employee creativity in system integration companies: The mediating effects of exploitation and exploration

We introduce individual social network at the group level into a creativity model.We show how firm can improve individual creativity depending on the working style.We show that exploitation and exploration positively affect individual creativity.We show that formation of learning culture positively affects the working style.We show that degree centrality influence exploration, but structural holes do not. To maximize employee performance in today's increasingly competitive environment, companies must enhance individual creativity through the effective management of organizational network structures and learning cultures. This study is an empirical analysis of how firms should design these structures and improve individual creativity according to employees' working styles. We propose a research model that delineates the effect of organizational learning culture on working styles and creativity. For organizational social network structures, we measured degree centrality and structural holes. Employees' working styles were represented as either "exploitation" or "exploration." To validate the model, we collected questionnaires from 137 individual members of 25 recently organized teams in several large system integration companies in South Korea, analyzing the data using a structural equation model. We found that most constructs, with the exception of social network structure, positively influenced individual creativity. With respect to organizational network structure, degree of centrality had a significant effect on both exploitation and exploration.

[1]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Revisiting the Birth Order-Creativity Connection: The Role of Sibling Constellation , 2005 .

[2]  C. Shalley,et al.  Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave , 2000 .

[3]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[4]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Leader Behaviors and the Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support , 2004 .

[5]  Elena Revilla,et al.  Managing the knowledge paradox in product development , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[7]  P. Bierly,et al.  Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms , 2007 .

[8]  Jacob Eisenberg How Individualism-Collectivism Moderates the Effects of Rewards on Creativity and Innovation: A Comparative Review of Practices in Japan and the US , 1999 .

[9]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[10]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Creativity of student information system projects: From the perspective of network embeddedness , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Transformational Leadership, Conservation, and Creativity: Evidence From Korea , 2003 .

[12]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in work unit knowledge management , 2007, DATB.

[13]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[14]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF ORGANISATIONAL CREATIVITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2001 .

[16]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[17]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[18]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[19]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[20]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[21]  Giles Hirst,et al.  A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity , 2009 .

[22]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[23]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[24]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[25]  Robert Eisenberger,et al.  Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity , 2009 .

[26]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[27]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality , 2001 .

[28]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[30]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Jing Zhou When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[33]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire , 2003 .

[34]  F. Vijver,et al.  Cross-Cultural Survey Methods , 2002 .

[35]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[36]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[37]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[38]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Memory: The Influence of Past and Current Networks on Performance , 2004 .

[40]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Rewarding creativity: when does it really matter? , 2003 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[42]  J. George,et al.  When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice , 2001 .

[43]  Markus Baer The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[45]  Wenpin Tsai Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[46]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[47]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[48]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[50]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[51]  C. Shalley,et al.  RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[52]  Yoris A. Au Design Science I: The Role of Design Science in Electronic Commerce Research , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[53]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[54]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED ALLIANCE NETWORKS. , 2007 .

[55]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[56]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[57]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  There's No Place like Home? The Contributions of Work and Nonwork Creativity Support to Employees' Creative Performance , 2002 .