Outcomes of Primary Unilateral Cheiloplasty in Same-Day Surgical Settings

Background Financial, clinical, and psychological considerations have made same-day surgery an attractive option for a variety of procedures. This article aimed to analyse the postoperative results of same-day primary unilateral cleft nasolabial repair. Methods This study was performed from 2011 to 2014. Unilateral cleft lip patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were preoperatively classified as mild, moderate, and severe. All patients underwent same-day surgery and were discharged after satisfying the appropriate clinical criteria, receiving thorough counselling, and the establishment of a means of communication by phone. Postoperative outcomes were assessed and stratified according to preoperative severity and the type of repair. Results A total of 423 primary unilateral cleft lip patients were included. Fisher's anatomical subunit approximation technique was the most common procedure, followed by Noordhoff's technique. The postoperative outcome was good in 89.8% of cases, fair in 9.9% of cases, and poor in 0.2% of cases. The complication rate was 1.18% (n=5), and no instances of mortality were observed. The average hospital stay was 7.5 hours, leading to a cost reduction of 19% in comparison with patients who stayed overnight for observation. Conclusions Mild unilateral cleft lip was the most common deformity for which Fisher's anatomical subunit approximation technique was performed in most of the cases, with satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Refinements in the cleft rhinoplasty techniques over the course of the study improved the results regarding cleft nasal symmetry. Single-day primary unilateral cleft cheiloplasty was found to be a cost-effective procedure that did not pose an additional risk of complications.

[1]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Evaluating the Need for Routine Admission following Primary Cleft Palate Repair: An Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  Y. Amitai,et al.  Prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial clefts among Jews and Arabs, by type, site, gender and geography: a multi-center study in Israel. , 2014, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[3]  Peter J. Taub,et al.  Oral Clefting in China Over the Last Decade: 205,679 Patients , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[4]  A. W. Lanre,et al.  Surgical outcome and complications following cleft lip and palate repair in a teaching hospital in Nigeria , 2013, African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS.

[5]  B. Rajanikanth,et al.  Assessment of Deformities of the Lip and Nose in Cleft Lip Alveolus and Palate Patients by a Rating Scale , 2012, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.

[6]  T. Iqbal,et al.  EVALUATING ANATOMICAL SUBUNIT APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUE FOR UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP REPAIR , 2011 .

[7]  Mark A. Warner,et al.  Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters , 2011, Anesthesiology.

[8]  Wig The current status of day care surgery..... A review , 2005 .

[9]  I. Jackson,et al.  Epidemiology of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate in Pakistan , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  A. Duhamel,et al.  Evaluation of the results of cleft lip and palate surgical treatment: preliminary report. , 1997, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  K. Moisted TREATMENT OUTCOME IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE : ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES , 2022 .