Properties of Noise in Positron Emission Tomography Images Reconstructed with Filtered-Backprojection and Row-Action Maximum Likelihood Algorithm

Noise levels observed in positron emission tomography (PET) images complicate their geometric interpretation. Post-processing techniques aimed at noise reduction may be employed to overcome this problem. The detailed characteristics of the noise affecting PET images are, however, often not well known. Typically, it is assumed that overall the noise may be characterized as Gaussian. Other PET-imaging-related studies have been specifically aimed at the reduction of noise represented by a Poisson or mixed Poisson + Gaussian model. The effectiveness of any approach to noise reduction greatly depends on a proper quantification of the characteristics of the noise present. This work examines the statistical properties of noise in PET images acquired with a GEMINI PET/CT scanner. Noise measurements have been performed with a cylindrical phantom injected with 11C and well mixed to provide a uniform activity distribution. Images were acquired using standard clinical protocols and reconstructed with filtered-backprojection (FBP) and row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA). Statistical properties of the acquired data were evaluated and compared to five noise models (Poisson, normal, negative binomial, log-normal, and gamma). Histograms of the experimental data were used to calculate cumulative distribution functions and produce maximum likelihood estimates for the parameters of the model distributions. Results obtained confirm the poor representation of both RAMLA- and FBP-reconstructed PET data by the Poisson distribution. We demonstrate that the noise in RAMLA-reconstructed PET images is very well characterized by gamma distribution followed closely by normal distribution, while FBP produces comparable conformity with both normal and gamma statistics.

[1]  H. Groen,et al.  Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  H N Wagner,et al.  Assessment of pulmonary lesions with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron imaging using coincidence mode gamma cameras. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Osama Mawlawi,et al.  Partial Volume Effect Correction , 2001 .

[5]  G T Gullberg,et al.  Quantitative potentials of dynamic emission computed tomography. , 1978, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Jeffrey D Bradley,et al.  Implementing biologic target volumes in radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[8]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  B. F. Logan,et al.  The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .

[10]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  S. Dai,et al.  A pseudo-Poisson noise model for simulation of positron emission tomographic projection data. , 1992, Medical physics.

[12]  Richard L. Wahl,et al.  Principles and Practice of Positron Emission Tomography , 2002 .

[13]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[14]  R Iwata,et al.  Differential diagnosis of lung tumor with positron emission tomography: a prospective study. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Hiroyuki Kudo,et al.  Subset-dependent relaxation in block-iterative algorithms for image reconstruction in emission tomography. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[18]  Pasha Razifar Novel Approaches for Application of Principal Component Analysis on Dynamic PET Images for Improvement of Image Quality and Clinical Diagnosis , 2005 .

[19]  M. Rzeszotarski,et al.  Counting statistics. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[20]  Dan J Kadrmas,et al.  LOR-OSEM: statistical PET reconstruction from raw line-of-response histograms , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Charles L. Byrne,et al.  Noise characterization of block-iterative reconstruction algorithms. I. Theory , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  M Defrise,et al.  Resolution improvement and noise reduction in human pinhole SPECT using a multi-ray approach and the SHINE method , 2009, Nuklearmedizin.

[23]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Physiological imaging of the brain with PET , 2001 .

[24]  J. Hilbe Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[25]  M. Mandelkern Nuclear Techniques for Medical Imaging: Positron Emission Tomography , 1995 .

[26]  A. Kuten,et al.  Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Jeffrey Bisker,et al.  Principles and Practice of Positron Emission Tomography. , 2003 .

[28]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[29]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Denoising of medical images corrupted by Poisson noise , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[31]  M. Rzeszotarski The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents , 1999 .

[32]  C E Metz,et al.  Analysis of recorded image noise in nuclear medicine. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  J. M. Ollinger,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography , 2018, Handbook of Small Animal Imaging.

[34]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[35]  Benjamin M. W. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of filtered-backprojection and ML-EM reconstructed emission tomographic images , 1992 .

[36]  M Soltys,et al.  Improving treatment planning accuracy through multimodality imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  R. Huesman,et al.  Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  P. Hannequin,et al.  Statistical and heuristic image noise extraction (SHINE): a new method for processing Poisson noise in scintigraphic images. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.