Body scanning: The effects of subject respiration and foot positioning on the data integrity of scanned measurements

Describes research designed to examine the effects of subject positioning on the accuracy of body scan data. A body measurement system developed by the Textile Clothing Technology Corporation was used to acquire two scans from each of 72 subjects. The subjects were instructed to continue to breathe normally and stand with their feet shoulder‐width apart. The two scans were compared and statistical analysis was performed to determine the precision of the results and whether this lack of standardization affected the data. Physical measurements were also obtained from each subject and served as a basis for comparison to the scanned measurements. Since physical measurements are the current accepted “true value”, these measurements determined the level of accuracy of scanned data. Three separate scans of 72 different subjects were taken at various levels of breathing and at various foot positions to determine the effect of the variables. This study certainly indicates that respiration and foot placement has a significant effect on body scan data. It was established that the scan data rendered by the software does have precision, but lacks accuracy when compared against physical measurements. This may be owing to the inaccuracies of the physical measurement process or to differences in measurement location between the anthropometrist and the 3D measurement extraction software. Information detailing the level of accuracy and precision that can be obtained with scanning software and how respiration and subject positioning can affect the data are included.

[1]  Peng Li,et al.  Automated Extraction of Anthropometric Data from 3D Images , 2000 .

[2]  Jeffery D. Hurley,et al.  Three-dimensional surface capture for body measurement using projected sinusoidal patterns , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  K. Kaufmann Invasion of the body scanners , 1997 .

[4]  D. Williamson,et al.  Precision of recumbent anthropometry , 1993, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[5]  E J Lovesey,et al.  The development of a 3-dimensional anthropometric measuring technique. , 1974, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  W. Mueller,et al.  Reliability, dependability, and precision of anthropometric measurements. The Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1976-1980. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  Steven Paquette,et al.  3D scanning in apparel design and human engineering , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  Reducing movement artifacts in whole body scanning , 1997, Proceedings. International Conference on Recent Advances in 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No.97TB100134).

[9]  Cynthia L. Istook,et al.  3D body scanning systems with application to the apparel industry , 2001 .

[10]  Bruce Bradtmiller,et al.  Interobserver error in a large scale anthropometric survey , 1992, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.