Receiver operating characteristic and confidence error metrics for assessing the performance of automatic target recognition systems
暂无分享,去创建一个
The ability of certain performance metrics to quantify how well a target recognition system under test SUT can correctly identify tar- gets and non-targets is investigated. The SUT, which may employ opti- cal, microwave, or other inputs, assigns a score between zero and one that indicates the predicted probability of a target. Sampled target and nontarget SUT score outputs are generated using representative sets of beta probability densities. Two performance metrics, the area under the receiver operating characteristic AURC and the confidence error CE, are analyzed. The AURC quantifies how well the target and nontarget distributions are separated, and the CE quantifies the statistical accuracy of each assigned score. The CE and AURC were generated for many representative sets of beta-distributed scores, and the metrics were cal- culated and compared using continuous methods as well as discrete sampling methods. Close agreement in results with these methods for the AURC is shown. While the continuous and the discrete CE are shown to be similar, differences are shown in various discrete CE ap- proaches, which occur when bins of various sizes are used. A method for an alternative weighted CE calculation using maximum likelihood estima- tion of density parameters is identified. This method enables sampled data to be processed using continuous methods. © 2005 Society of Photo-
[1] Lori A. Westerkamp,et al. Performance measures for summarizing confusion matrices: the AFRL COMPASE approach , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[2] Timothy D. Ross,et al. Adaptive SAR ATR problem set (AdaptSAPS) , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[3] Andrew P. Bradley,et al. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..
[4] K. Ramachandran,et al. Mathematical Statistics with Applications. , 1992 .