High‐resolution fields of global runoff combining observed river discharge and simulated water balances

[1] This paper demonstrates the potential of combining observed river discharge information with climate-driven water balance model (WBM) outputs to develop composite runoff fields. Such combined runoff fields simultaneously reflect the numerical accuracy of the discharge measurements and preserve the spatial and temporal distribution of simulated runoff. Selected gauging stations from the World Meteorological Organization Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC) data archive were geographically coregistered to a gridded simulated topological network at 30′ (longitude × latitude) spatial resolution (STN–30p). Interstation regions between gauging stations along the STN–30p network were identified, and annual interstation runoff was calculated. The annual interstation runoff was compared with outputs from WBM calculations, which were performed using long-term mean monthly climate forcings (air temperature and precipitation). The simulated runoff for each cell was multiplied by the ratio of observed to simulated runoff of the corresponding interstation region from the GRDC data set to create spatially distributed runoff fields at 30′ resolution. The resulting composite runoff fields (UNH/GRDC Composite Runoff Fields V1.0) are released to the scientific community along with intermediate data sets, such as station attributes and long-term monthly regimes of the selected gauging stations, the simulated topological network (STN–30p), STN–30p derived attributes for the selected stations, and gridded fields of the interstation regions along STN–30p. These data sets represent high-resolution fields that are of value to a broad range of water-related research, including terrestrial modeling, climate-atmosphere interactions, and global water resource assessments.

[1]  C. Birkett,et al.  Contribution of the TOPEX NASA Radar Altimeter to the global monitoring of large rivers and wetlands , 1998 .

[2]  S. E. Rantz,et al.  Measurement and computation of streamflow , 1982 .

[3]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Analyzing the discharge regime of a large tropical river through remote sensing, ground-based climatic data, and modeling , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  The Pilot Phase of the Global Soil Wetness Project , 1999 .

[5]  Taikan Oki,et al.  Assessment of Annual Runoff from Land Surface Models Using Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP) , 1999 .

[6]  H. Renssen,et al.  A global river routing network for use in hydrological modeling , 2000 .

[7]  D. Legates,et al.  Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge‐corrected, global precipitation , 1990 .

[8]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Global River Discharge, 1807-1991, V[ersion]. 1.1 (RivDIS) , 1998 .

[9]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Assessment of contemporary Arctic river runoff based on observational discharge records , 2001 .

[10]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[11]  L. Smith.  Satellite remote sensing of river inundation area, stage, and discharge: a review , 1997 .

[12]  Yale Mintz,et al.  Climatology of the terrestrial seasonal water cycle , 1985 .

[13]  B. Turner.  The Earth as Transformed by Human Action , 1988 .

[14]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Geomorphometric attributes of the global system of rivers at 30-minute spatial resolution , 2000 .

[15]  W. Gutowski,et al.  Atmospheric Water Vapor Transport in NCEP–NCAR Reanalyses: Comparison with River Discharge in the Central United States , 1997 .

[16]  K. A. Browning,et al.  Global Energy and Water Cycles , 1999 .

[17]  A. Baumgartner.  The world water balance , 1975 .

[18]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: Development, analysis, and control of error , 2001 .

[19]  Petra Döll,et al.  Global water data: A newly endangered species , 2001 .

[20]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Global system of rivers: Its role in organizing continental land mass and defining land‐to‐ocean linkages , 2000 .

[21]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling , 1998 .

[22]  Marcos Heil Costa,et al.  Water balance of the Amazon Basin: Dependence on vegetation cover and canopy conductance , 1997 .

[23]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Continental scale models of water balance and fluvial transport: An application to South America , 1989 .

[24]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Five‐minute, 1/2°, and 1° data sets of continental watersheds and river networks for use in regional and global hydrologic and climate system modeling studies , 1999 .

[25]  D. Legates,et al.  Mean seasonal and spatial variability in global surface air temperature , 1990 .

[26]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[27]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  A parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale , 1997 .

[28]  Charles J Vörösmarty,et al.  Intercomparison of Methods for Calculating Potential Evaporation in Regional and Global Water Balance Models , 1996 .

[29]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Human Appropriation of Renewable Fresh Water , 1996, Science.