Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers

We analysed 148 primary breast cancers using BAC-arrays containing 287 clones representing cancer-related gene/loci to obtain genomic molecular portraits. Gains were detected in 136 tumors (91.9%) and losses in 123 tumors (83.1%). Eight tumors (5.4%) did not have any genomic aberrations in the 281 clones analysed. Common (more than 15% of the samples) gains were observed at 8q11–qtel, 1q21–qtel, 17q11–q12 and 11q13, whereas common losses were observed at 16q12–qtel, 11ptel–p15.5, 1p36–ptel, 17p11.2–p12 and 8ptel–p22. Patients with tumors registering either less than 5% (median value) or less than 11% (third quartile) total copy number changes had a better overall survival (log-rank test: P=0.0417 and P=0.0375, respectively). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on copy number changes identified four clusters. Women with tumors from the cluster with amplification of three regions containing known breast oncogenes (11q13, 17q12 and 20q13) had a worse prognosis. The good prognosis group (Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) ⩽3.4) tumors had frequent loss of 16q24–qtel. Genes significantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER), Grade and NPI were used to build k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifiers that predicted ER, Grade and NPI status in the test set with an average misclassification rate of 24.7, 25.7 and 35.7%, respectively. These data raise the prospect of generating a molecular taxonomy of breast cancer based on copy number profiling using tumor DNA, which may be more generally applicable than expression microarray analysis.

[1]  J Piper,et al.  Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Kylie L. Gorringe,et al.  Degenerate oligonucleotide primed-polymerase chain reaction-based array comparative genomic hybridization for extensive amplicon profiling of breast cancers : a new approach for the molecular analysis of paraffin-embedded cancer tissue. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[3]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Jorge S. Reis-Filho,et al.  Molecular Cytogenetic Identification of Subgroups of Grade III Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinomas with Different Clinical Outcomes , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  Richard M. Simon,et al.  Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data , 2002, Bioinform..

[6]  J. Andersen,et al.  Karyotypic evolution in breast carcinomas with i(1)(q10) and der(1;16)(q10;p10) as the primary chromosome abnormality. , 1999, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[7]  A. Hanby,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer research.

[8]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Breast tumor copy number aberration phenotypes and genomic instability , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[9]  R. Fulthorpe,et al.  Identification of estrogen-responsive genes by complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarray and characterization of a novel early estrogen-induced gene: EEIG1. , 2004, Molecular endocrinology.

[10]  J. Varley,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridisation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: identification of regions of DNA amplification and deletion in common with invasive breast carcinoma , 1997, Oncogene.

[11]  Teri Oldaker,et al.  DNA ploidy, S-phase, and steroid receptors in more than 127,000 breast cancer patients , 1993, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[12]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Deciphering a subgroup of breast carcinomas with putative progression of grade during carcinogenesis revealed by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and immunohistochemistry , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[14]  T. Higashiyama,et al.  Classification of Human Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiling as a Component of the Survival Predictor Algorithm , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  R. Marcos,et al.  The Fanconi anaemia genome stability and tumour suppressor network. , 2002, Mutagenesis.

[16]  Stefan Handt,et al.  Differences in genetic alterations between primary lobular and ductal breast cancers detected by comparative genomic hybridization , 2001, The Journal of pathology.

[17]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Identification and validation of prognostic markers in breast cancer with the complementary use of array‐CGH and tissue microarrays , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  Barbara J. Trask,et al.  Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Genomic Alterations in Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2004, Cancer Research.

[19]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Nicolas Stransky,et al.  Visualizing chromosomes as transcriptome correlation maps: evidence of chromosomal domains containing co-expressed genes--a study of 130 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. , 2005, Cancer research.

[21]  Mattias Höglund,et al.  Microarray analyses reveal strong influence of DNA copy number alterations on the transcriptional patterns in pancreatic cancer: implications for the interpretation of genomic amplifications , 2005, Oncogene.

[22]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  T. Speed,et al.  Statistical issues in cDNA microarray data analysis. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  R Tibshirani,et al.  Combined microarray analysis of small cell lung cancer reveals altered apoptotic balance and distinct expression signatures of MYC family gene amplification , 2006, Oncogene.

[25]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[26]  Joel Greshock,et al.  High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[27]  A. Patchefsky,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer , 1985, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  C. Caldas,et al.  Absence of rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene in human cancers , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  J Isola,et al.  Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH , 1998, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[30]  F. Rösel,et al.  Amplification of the BCAS2 gene at chromosome 1p13.3-21 in human primary breast cancer. , 2002, Cancer letters.

[31]  Maria Teresa Landi,et al.  MC1R, ASIP, and DNA repair in sporadic and familial melanoma in a Mediterranean population. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Peter Schraml,et al.  Prognostic Relevance of Gene Amplifications and Coamplifications in Breast Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[34]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[35]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Mapping the amplification of EIF3S3 in breast and prostate cancer , 2000, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[36]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[37]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[38]  J. Zavadil,et al.  Integration of TGF-beta/Smad and Jagged1/Notch signalling in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[39]  P. Lichter,et al.  Candidate genes in breast cancer revealed by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization of archived tissue. , 2005, Cancer research.

[40]  Roland Eils,et al.  High-Resolution Genomic Profiling Reveals Association of Chromosomal Aberrations on 1q and 16p with Histologic and Genetic Subgroups of Invasive Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  S. Saydam,et al.  DNA copy number changes detected by comparative genomic hybridization and their association with clinicopathologic parameters in breast tumors. , 2003, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[42]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[43]  J. Zavadil,et al.  Integration of TGF‐β/Smad and Jagged1/Notch signalling in epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition , 2004 .

[44]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Jorma Isola,et al.  Patterns of chromosomal imbalances defines subgroups of breast cancer with distinct clinical features and prognosis. A study of 305 tumors by comparative genomic hybridization. , 2003, Cancer research.

[46]  J. Russo,et al.  Evidence for the notch signaling pathway on the role of estrogen in angiogenesis. , 2004, Molecular endocrinology.