Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: State of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels

Abstract Infill-frame interaction constitutes a still open question both in research and in practicing engineering. Computational models used to predict this interaction are, in most cases, addressing the estimation of the response of the infilled frames when subjected to actions parallel to their plane. However, the observation of the post-earthquake damage has demonstrated that infills, weakened by the in-plane actions, may fail out-of-plane increasing the risks associated to the earthquake scenarios. In spite of this, different studies have shown that infills, if properly designed and supported by the frame, exhibit a significant strength and displacement capacity when called to resist to out-of-plane actions, offering the possibility to develop an arching mechanism in their deformed configuration. The prediction of the combined in-plane out-of-plane response prefigures the new goal of the seismic assessment of masonry infilled frames. This paper presents an in-depth literature review of the capacity models developed for the prediction of the out-of-plane response of infilled frames, from the first flexural based computational models to the models implementing the arching action theory in their formulation. A comparison between the results obtainable is provided in order to compare the models reliability against the results of different experimental tests. A final discussion is devoted to the effectiveness the recent integrated in-plane/out-of-plane macromodels used in 3D structural models. A new promising approach, based on the use nonlinear fiber-section elements, is also outlined providing a numerical testing of the capacity of such elements to naturally account for the out-of-plane arching mechanism.

[1]  Richard M. Bennett,et al.  Bidirectional Behavior of Structural Clay Tile Infilled Frames , 1999 .

[2]  B Stafford Smith,et al.  A METHOD OF ANALYSIS FOR INFILLED FRAMES. , 1969 .

[3]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[4]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Shake‐table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall , 2006 .

[5]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame — a deterministic assessment , 2008 .

[6]  Alessandra Fiore,et al.  The influence of masonry infill on the seismic behaviour of RC frame buildings , 2012 .

[7]  Rita Greco,et al.  On the prediction of shear brittle collapse mechanisms due to the infill-frame interaction in RC buildings under pushover analysis , 2016 .

[8]  Daniel P. Abrams,et al.  Out-of-Plane Strength of Unreinforced Masonry Infill Panels , 1996 .

[9]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Cyclic response of masonry infilled RC frames: Experimental results and simplified modeling , 2014 .

[10]  Amin Mohebkhah,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling of Masonry-Infilled Frames , 2016 .

[11]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Evaluation of infilled frames: an updated in-plane-stiffness macro-model considering the effects of vertical loads , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  K. E. McKee,et al.  Arching Action Theory of Masonry Walls , 1956 .

[13]  Robert G. Drysdale,et al.  Out-of-Plane Bending of Concrete Block Walls , 1988 .

[14]  K. Mosalam,et al.  Modeling of Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls Considering In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Interaction , 2009 .

[15]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Prediction of the additional shear action on frame members due to infills , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Lawrence D. Reaveley,et al.  NEHRP Guidelines and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings , 2000 .

[17]  Panagiotis G. Asteris,et al.  Lateral Stiffness of Brick Masonry Infilled Plane Frames , 2003 .

[18]  I. N. Doudoumis,et al.  Finite element modelling and investigation of the behaviour of elastic infilled frames under monotonic loading , 2007 .

[19]  J. L. Dawe,et al.  Out-of-plane resistance of concrete masonry infilled panels , 1989 .

[20]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  About the influence of the infill panels over the collapse mechanisms actived under pushover analyses: Two case studies , 2012 .

[21]  Richard M. Bennett,et al.  Arching of Masonry Infilled Frames: Comparison of Analytical Methods , 1999 .

[22]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT MODELING OF MASONRy-INFILLED RC FRAMES , 1997 .

[23]  P. B. Shing,et al.  An appraisal of smeared crack models for masonry shear wall analysis , 1991 .

[24]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Analysis of Seismic Response of Masonry‐Infilled RC Frames through Collapse , 2014 .

[25]  Amin Mohebkhah,et al.  Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art , 2013 .

[26]  Seyyed Hadi Hashemi,et al.  Seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings including effects of masonry infill walls , 2007 .

[27]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Masonry infills and RC frames interaction: literature overview and state of the art of macromodeling approach , 2015 .

[28]  Vaibhav Singhal,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Framed Masonry Panels with Prior Damage When Subjected to Out-of-Plane Loading , 2011 .

[29]  Selim Günay,et al.  Progressive Collapse Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Unreinforced Masonry Infill Walls considering In-Plane/Out-of-Plane Interaction , 2015 .

[30]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  A macro-modelling approach for the analysis of infilled frame structures considering the effects of openings and vertical loads , 2016 .

[31]  Richard E. Angel,et al.  Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls , 1994 .

[32]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of the stiffening effect of infills , 2003 .