Are Green Spaces More Available and Accessible to Green Building Users? A Comparative Study in Texas

Green buildings (GBs) and green spaces (GSs) play a key foundational role as important drivers of urban Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). There have been many studies on the spatial distribution of GBs and GSs, but relevant studies exploring the spatial relationship between GBs and GSs are lacking. The research questions were: whether GBs are more likely to access GSs than nongreen buildings (NGBs) and whether GBs with higher certification levels are more likely to access GSs. In this study, we used Texas and its four major cities (Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio) as case studies to compare the availability and accessibility of GSs to GBs (certified by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, LEED by U.S. Green Building Council) and NGBs. The study was conducted using spatial analysis tools in a geographic information system (GIS) to explore the spatial distribution of GBs and quantify the availability and accessibility of GSs in a comparison of GBs and NGBs and different GB certification levels. The study found that GBs in each city showed uneven distribution with multicore distribution. In addition, the availability and accessibility of GSs for GBs are lower than for NGBs, and the ability to obtain GSs does not increase with higher GB certification levels. This is because many GBs are located in areas far from the city center or in small cities around large cities where there are few GSs available, resulting in a mismatch in the distribution of GBs and GSs. The study also reviewed the certification manuals and found that LEED has regulated GSs at the city and community levels, yet has ignored them at the building level, and thus further suggests specific improvements. This study provides references and suggestions for adding GSs to the certification content, helping policymakers to optimize future efforts to improve GB certification programs and contributing to the eventual greater role of GBs and GSs together in urban SDGs.

[1]  A. Laurent,et al.  National SDG-7 performance assessment to support achieving sustainable energy for all within planetary limits , 2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[2]  J. Amaro-Mellado,et al.  Influence of the Urban Green Spaces of Seville (Spain) on Housing Prices through the Hedonic Assessment Methodology and Geospatial Analysis , 2022, Sustainability.

[3]  Chen Gao,et al.  Interpretation of Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Community Green Spaces Based on Service Efficiency and Distribution Characteristics: A Case Study of the Main Urban Area of Beijing, China , 2022, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[4]  R. Leicht,et al.  Evaluating the Sustainability of New Construction Projects over Time by Examining the Evolution of the LEED Rating System , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  Z. Gou,et al.  An Investigation of Green Roof Spatial Distribution and Incentive Policies Using Green Buildings as a Benchmark , 2022, Land.

[6]  Thomas Walker,et al.  Green building standards and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  A. Lechner,et al.  Malaysians’ Perception on the Contribution of Urban Green Spaces to the Un Sustainable Development Goals , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Jinxia Zhu,et al.  Unravelling the association between polycentric urban development and landscape sustainability in urbanizing island cities , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[9]  I-Chun Tsaim Value capitalization effects of green buildings: A new insight through time trends and differences in various price levels , 2022, Building and Environment.

[10]  Z. Shao,et al.  Time-series land cover mapping and urban expansion analysis using OpenStreetMap data and remote sensing big data: A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China , 2022, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  B. Lin,et al.  Post occupancy investigation of 40 certified green buildings in Beijing: Results, lessons and policy suggestions , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[12]  Yangbing Zhang,et al.  A city-level analysis of the spatial distribution differences of green buildings and its economic forces – A case study in China , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[13]  Mingzhu Lei,et al.  A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Global LEED Research , 2022, Buildings.

[14]  Dian Zhou,et al.  Correlation between cooling effect of green space and surrounding urban spatial form: Evidence from 36 urban green spaces , 2022, Building and Environment.

[15]  J. Jiao,et al.  Who loses and who wins in the ride-hailing era? A case study of Austin, Texas , 2022, Transport Policy.

[16]  Md. Badrul Hyder,et al.  Understanding the Linkages and Importance of Urban Greenspaces for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals 2030 , 2022, Journal of Sustainable Development.

[17]  H. -. Kim,et al.  Urban green space alone is not enough: A landscape analysis linking the spatial distribution of urban green space to mental health in the city of Chicago , 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[18]  E. Ramadan,et al.  Spatial disparity patterns of green spaces and buildings in arid urban areas , 2022, Building and Environment.

[19]  Yuquan Tong,et al.  Spatial differentiation of traditional villages using ArcGIS and GeoDa: A case study of Southwest China , 2021, Ecol. Informatics.

[20]  J. Oliver-Villanueva,et al.  Contribution of green urban areas to the achievement of SDGs. Case study in Valencia (Spain) , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[21]  S. Pushkar LEED-EB Gold Projects for Office Spaces in Large Buildings Transitioning from Version 3 (v3) to 4 (v4): Similarities and Differences between Finland and Spain , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[22]  Byeol Kim,et al.  An Investigation of the Selection of LEED Version 4 Credits for Sustainable Building Projects , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[23]  H. Vejre,et al.  Evaluating the disparities in urban green space provision in communities with diverse built environments: The case of a rapidly urbanizing Chinese city , 2020 .

[24]  Wei Wang,et al.  The role and contribution of green buildings on sustainable development goals , 2020 .

[25]  Z. Gou,et al.  Association between green building certification level and post-occupancy performance: Database analysis of the National Australian Built Environment Rating System , 2020 .

[26]  Hong Xian Li,et al.  Incorporating biophilic criteria into green building rating tools: Case study of Green Mark and LEED , 2020 .

[27]  Qiuhao Xie,et al.  Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Green Building Development in China , 2020, Sustainability.

[28]  Zhaowu Yu,et al.  Links between green space and public health: a bibliometric review of global research trends and future prospects from 1901 to 2019 , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[29]  Zhaowu Yu,et al.  Critical review on the cooling effect of urban blue-green space: A threshold-size perspective , 2020 .

[30]  R. Bardhan,et al.  Geospatial approach for assessing spatiotemporal dynamics of urban green space distribution among neighbourhoods: A demonstration in Mumbai , 2020 .

[31]  Bao-jie He Towards the next generation of green building for urban heat island mitigation: Zero UHI impact building , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[32]  D. Kammen,et al.  A Survey of the Status and Challenges of Green Building Development in Various Countries , 2019, Sustainability.

[33]  C. Kibert,et al.  Sustainability and resilience: A review of definitions, relationships, and their integration into a combined building assessment framework , 2019, Building and Environment.

[34]  Wen Wang,et al.  Building visual green index: A measure of visual green spaces for urban building , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[35]  A. Amiri,et al.  Are LEED-Certified Buildings Energy-Efficient in Practice? , 2019, Sustainability.

[36]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts , 2018 .

[37]  Jing Wu,et al.  Turning green into gold: A review on the economics of green buildings , 2018 .

[38]  Wanxia Zhao,et al.  The spatial distribution of green buildings in China: Regional imbalance, economic fundamentals, and policy incentives , 2017 .

[39]  Jens Kolbe,et al.  Access to urban green space and environmental inequalities in Germany , 2017 .

[40]  Sara Meerow,et al.  Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit , 2017 .

[41]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Urban green space availability in European cities , 2016 .

[42]  Annie M. Hunter,et al.  Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes , 2015 .

[43]  J. Wolch,et al.  Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’ , 2014 .

[44]  Stephen Gibbons,et al.  The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach , 2014 .

[45]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings , 2013 .

[46]  Chris Pyke,et al.  Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation , 2013 .

[47]  K. P. Sharma,et al.  Urban Neighborhood Green Index – A measure of green spaces in urban areas , 2012 .

[48]  R. Maheswaran,et al.  The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[49]  Ulrika K. Stigsdotter,et al.  The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration , 2010 .

[50]  J. Cidell,et al.  Spatial Variation Among Green Building Certification Categories: Does Place Matter? , 2009 .

[51]  N. Nakagoshi,et al.  Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China , 2007 .

[52]  A. B. Morancho A hedonic valuation of urban green areas , 2003 .