Association between uterine repair at laparoscopic myomectomy and postoperative adhesions

Objective. To determine whether uterine repair at laparoscopic myomectomy influences postoperative adhesions. Design. Retrospective study. Setting. University‐affiliated hospital. Population. A total of 108 patients who underwent second‐look laparoscopy after laparoscopic myomectomy without concomitant pelvic surgery between January 2006 and May 2010. Methods. Absorbable cellulose adhesion barriers were used for uterine repair at initial surgery in all women. The presence of adhesions was evaluated by second‐look laparoscopy. Main outcome measures. The influence of background factors (diameter of largest myoma, number of myomas, incision sites and number of suture layers) and the uterine status immediately after uterine repair at laparoscopic myomectomy (number, length and location of wounds, as well as wound appearance classified as virtually normal, swollen or protruding) on adhesion formation were analysed in 108 women with 296 uterine wounds. Data were analysed by logistic regression analysis. Results. Forty‐one (38.0%) women had adhesions to their uterus at follow up. We identified 48 (16.2%) adhesions among 296 wounds in all women. A protruding wound was significantly associated with postoperative wound adhesion (odds ratio, 2.53; p=0.02). The number of enucleated subserosal myomas (odds ratio, 3.29; p<0.001) and the diameter of the largest myoma (odds ratio, 1.05; p<0.001) were significantly associated with wound protrusion, which was a critical factor influencing adhesion. Conclusions. Postoperative wound adhesion formation seems to depend on uterine status immediately after laparoscopic myomectomy.

[1]  L. Mettler,et al.  Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  S. Takeda,et al.  Evaluation of factors contributing to uterine scar formation after laparoscopic myomectomy , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  S. Takeda,et al.  Incidence of complications during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in patients after previous laparotomy. , 2010, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[4]  S. Takeda,et al.  Influencing factors of adhesion development and the efficacy of adhesion-preventing agents in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy as evaluated by a second-look laparoscopy. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  S. Itoh,et al.  Pregnancy and delivery after laparoscopic myomectomy. , 2003, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[6]  B. Hurst,et al.  Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  G. Bifulco,et al.  Effectiveness of autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  R. Kuwatsuru,et al.  The Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Limitations of Laparoscopic Myomectomy , 2003, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[9]  H. Takeuchi,et al.  Evaluation of adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy by systematic second-look microlaparoscopy. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[10]  E. Nishio,et al.  Postoperative adhesion prevention with an oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier in infertile women. , 2000, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  D. Wiseman,et al.  Effect of different barriers of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on cecal and sidewall adhesions in the presence and absence of bleeding. , 1999, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[12]  C. Chapron,et al.  Second look after laparoscopic myomectomy. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[13]  S. Guerriero,et al.  Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[14]  C. Chapron,et al.  Laparoscopic Myomectomy , 1994 .

[15]  Darwish,et al.  Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Sonographic Follow-Up and Second-Look Laparoscopy for the Evaluation of a New Technique , 1994, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[16]  H. Reich,et al.  Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: Evaluation at early second‐look procedures , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  Gynecologic surgery. , 1991, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[18]  A. Decherney,et al.  The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  M. Diamond,et al.  Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an absorbable barrier, TC-7. , 1987, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[20]  A. Goldfarb American Fertility Society , 1970 .