The genesis of climate change activism: from key beliefs to political action

Climate change activism has been uncommon in the U.S., but a growing national movement is pressing for a political response. To assess the cognitive and affective precursors of climate activism, we hypothesize and test a two-stage information-processing model based on social cognitive theory. In stage 1, expectations about climate change outcomes and perceived collective efficacy to mitigate the threat are hypothesized to influence affective issue involvement and support for societal mitigation action. In stage 2, beliefs about the effectiveness of political activism, perceived barriers to activist behaviors and opinion leadership are hypothesized to influence intended and actual activism. To test these hypotheses, we fit a structural equation model using nationally representative data. The model explains 52 percent of the variance in a latent variable representing three forms of climate change activism: contacting elected representatives; supporting organizations working on the issue; and attending climate change rallies or meetings. The results suggest that efforts to increase citizen activism should promote specific beliefs about climate change, build perceptions that political activism can be effective, and encourage interpersonal communication on the issue.

[1]  M. Schwebel.  Peace Activists: Maintaining Morale , 2008 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[3]  B. Klandermans,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Participation: social psychological correlates of participation in a social movement , 2014 .

[4]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[5]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups , 2001 .

[7]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Climate Change Beliefs, Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Actions , 2009 .

[8]  AdamsJames,et al.  Who Do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders , 2015 .

[9]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[10]  J. Jenkins,et al.  The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements , 1997 .

[11]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[12]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers , 2012 .

[14]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Communication and marketing as climate change-intervention assets a public health perspective. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  T. Skocpol.  NAMING THE PROBLEM What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming , 2013 .

[16]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation , 2009 .

[17]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Explicating Opinion Leadership: Nonpolitical Dispositions, Information Consumption, and Civic Participation , 2006 .

[18]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement , 2011 .

[20]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[21]  Patrick Sturgis,et al.  Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis , 2008 .

[22]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .

[23]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Participation: social psychological correlates of participation in a social movement , 2002 .

[25]  Gabriel Weimann,et al.  THE INFLUENTIALS: BACK TO THE CONCEPT OF OPINION LEADERS? , 1991 .

[26]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  The Blackwell companion to social movements , 2003 .

[27]  Arnold Vedlitz,et al.  Collective Action and Citizen Responses to Global Warming , 2007 .

[28]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Environmental Activism as Collective Action , 2002 .

[29]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[30]  Teresa A. Myers,et al.  The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming , 2012, Nature Climate Change.

[31]  L. Ezrow,et al.  Who Do European Parties Represent? How Western European Parties Represent the Policy Preferences of Opinion Leaders , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[32]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[33]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[34]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  The Origins and Consequences of democratic citizens' Policy Agendas: A Study of Popular Concern about Global Warming , 2006 .

[35]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[36]  S. Chaffee,et al.  INVOLVEMENT AND THE CONSISTENCY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIORS , 1986 .

[37]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.