Comparing short protein substructures by a method based on backbone torsion angles

An efficient algorithm was characterized that determines the similarity in main chain conformation between short protein substructures. The algorithm computes Δt, the root mean square difference in ϕ and ψ torsion angles over a small number of amino acids (typically 3–5). Using this algorithm, large number of protein substrates comparisons were feasible. The parameter Δt was sensitive to variations in local protein conformation, and it correlates with Δr, the root mean square deviation in atomic coordinates. Values for Δt were obtained that define similarity thresholds, which determine whether two substructure are considered structurally similar. To set a lower bound on the similarity threshold, we estimated the component of Δt due to measurement noise fromcomparisons of independently refined coordinates of the same protein. A sample distribution of Δt from nonhomologous protein comparisons identified an upper bound on the similarity threshold, one that refrains from incorporating large numbers of nonmatching comparisons large numbers of nonmatching comparisons. Unlike methods based on Cα atoms alone, Δt was sensitive to rotations in the peptide plane, shown to occur in several proteins. Comparisons of homologus proteins by Δt showed that the active site torsion angles are highly conserved. The Δt method was applied to the α‐chain of human hemoglobin, where it readily demonstrated the local differences in the structures of different ligation states.

[1]  L. Sieker,et al.  Structure of a bacterial ferredoxin. , 1973, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  Wayne A. Hendrickson,et al.  Transformations to optimize the superposition of similar structures , 1979 .

[3]  W. Kabsch A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1976 .

[4]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Comparison of two highly refined structures of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance and neutron diffraction studies of the complex of ribonuclease A with uridine vanadate, a transition-state analogue. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[6]  G. Rose,et al.  Loops in globular proteins: a novel category of secondary structure. , 1986, Science.

[7]  M. Sternberg,et al.  On the prediction of protein structure: The significance of the root-mean-square deviation. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Guss,et al.  Structure of oxidized poplar plastocyanin at 1.6 A resolution. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  Structure of the semiquinone form of flavodoxin from Clostridum MP. Extension of 1.8 A resolution and some comparisons with the oxidized state. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Nobuhiko Saitô,et al.  Tertiary Structure of Proteins. I. : Representation and Computation of the Conformations , 1972 .

[11]  R. Huber,et al.  The Geometry of the Reactive Site and of the Peptide Groups in Trypsin, Trypsinogen and its Complexes with Inhibitors , 1983 .

[12]  Robert M. Stroud,et al.  The accuracy of refined protein structures: comparison of two independently refined models of bovine trypsin , 1978 .

[13]  David S. Moss,et al.  Comparison of Two Independently Refined Models of Ribonuclease-A , 1986 .

[14]  E. Baker,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of the structure of actinidin at 1.7 Å resolution by fast Fourier least‐squares methods , 1980 .

[15]  C Chothia,et al.  Haemoglobin: the structural changes related to ligand binding and its allosteric mechanism. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  J. Thornton,et al.  Analysis and prediction of the different types of β-turn in proteins , 1988 .

[17]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Conformation change of cytochrome c. II. Ferricytochrome c refinement at 1.8 A and comparison with the ferrocytochrome structure. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  B. Shaanan,et al.  Structure of human oxyhaemoglobin at 2.1 A resolution. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  M G Rossmann,et al.  Comparison of super-secondary structures in proteins. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  D. Stuart,et al.  A method for the systematic comparison of the three‐dimensional structures of proteins and some results , 1984 .

[21]  J. Baldwin,et al.  The structure of human carbonmonoxy haemoglobin at 2.7 A resolution. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  L. H. Jensen,et al.  Structure of Peptococcus aerogenes ferredoxin. Refinement at 2 A resolution. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  W. Steigemann,et al.  Structure of erythrocruorin in different ligand states refined at 1.4 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  H Weinstein,et al.  Structural analysis of carboxypeptidase A and its complexes with inhibitors as a basis for modeling enzyme recognition and specificity , 1985, Biopolymers.

[25]  R. Kretsinger,et al.  Refinement of the structure of carp muscle calcium-binding parvalbumin by model building and difference Fourier analysis. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  R M Sweet,et al.  Evolutionary similarity among peptide segments is a basis for prediction of protein folding , 1986, Biopolymers.

[27]  C. Woodward,et al.  Structure of form III crystals of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Robert Huber,et al.  Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 1984 .

[29]  David S. Moss,et al.  Ribonuclease-A: least-squares refinement of the structure at 1.45 Å resolution , 1982 .

[30]  G. Cohen,et al.  Refined crystal structure of gamma-chymotrypsin at 1.9 A resolution. Comparison with other pancreatic serine proteases. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  S J Oatley,et al.  Structure of prealbumin: secondary, tertiary and quaternary interactions determined by Fourier refinement at 1.8 A. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  J. Richardson,et al.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. , 1981, Advances in protein chemistry.

[33]  W. Hol,et al.  Structure of bovine pancreatic phospholipase A2 at 1.7A resolution. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  W R Taylor,et al.  Recognition of super-secondary structure in proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  A. Lesk,et al.  How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  M. Perutz,et al.  The crystal structure of human deoxyhaemoglobin at 1.74 A resolution. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  A. Mclachlan Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Redox conformation changes in refined tuna cytochrome c. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Structure of ribonuclease A: results of joint neutron and X-ray refinement at 2.0-A resolution. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[40]  T. A. Jones,et al.  Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[41]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Preliminary refinement of protein coordinates in real space , 1975 .

[42]  G. Rose,et al.  Helix signals in proteins. , 1988, Science.

[43]  M J Sippl,et al.  On the problem of comparing protein structures. Development and applications of a new method for the assessment of structural similarities of polypeptide conformations. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  M. Levitt A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  W. Kabsch A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1978 .

[46]  S J Remington,et al.  A systematic approach to the comparison of protein structures. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  B F Anderson,et al.  Structure of azurin from Alcaligenes denitrificans at 2.5 A resolution. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  E J Milner-White,et al.  Beta-bulges within loops as recurring features of protein structure. , 1987, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[49]  J. Richardson,et al.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices. , 1988, Science.