The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field.

Over the full visual field, contrast sensitivity is fairly well described by a linear decline in log sensitivity as a function of eccentricity (expressed in grating cycles). However, many psychophysical studies of spatial visual function concentrate on the central ±4.5 deg (or so) of the visual field. As the details of the variation in sensitivity have not been well documented in this region we did so for small patches of target contrast at several spatial frequencies (0.7-4 c/deg), meridians (horizontal, vertical, and oblique), orientations (horizontal, vertical, and oblique), and eccentricities (0-18 cycles). To reduce the potential effects of stimulus uncertainty, circular markers surrounded the targets. Our analysis shows that the decline in binocular log sensitivity within the central visual field is bilinear: The initial decline is steep, whereas the later decline is shallow and much closer to the classical results. The bilinear decline was approximately symmetrical in the horizontal meridian and declined most steeply in the superior visual field. Further analyses showed our results to be scale-invariant and that this property could not be predicted from cone densities. We used the results from the cardinal meridians to radially interpolate an attenuation surface with the shape of a witch's hat that provided good predictions for the results from the oblique meridians. The witch's hat provides a convenient starting point from which to build models of contrast sensitivity, including those designed to investigate signal summation and neuronal convergence of the image contrast signal. Finally, we provide Matlab code for constructing the witch's hat.

[1]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Robinson.  Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[4]  L. O. Harvey,et al.  Light-difference threshold and subjective brightness in the periphery of the visual field , 1973, Psychologische Forschung.

[5]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[6]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  D. W. Watkins,et al.  Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity , 1975, Vision Research.

[8]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. II. The far peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0°–50°) , 1978 .

[10]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. I. The near peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0 degrees-8 degrees). , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[12]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[14]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  A. Johnston,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus , 1983, Vision Research.

[17]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Johnston,et al.  Spatial scaling of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[22]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[23]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  J P Tuck,et al.  Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity Functions across Three Orientations: Implications for Theory and Testing , 1991, Perception.

[26]  R. Hess,et al.  Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency, viewing distance and eccentricity with and without spatial noise , 1992, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[29]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Modelfest: year one results and plans for future years , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  E Peli,et al.  Luminance artifacts of cathode-ray tube displays for vision research. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[31]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Wim Vanduffel,et al.  The Radial Bias: A Different Slant on Visual Orientation Sensitivity in Human and Nonhuman Primates , 2006, Neuron.

[34]  T. Meese,et al.  Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Mylène C. Q. Farias,et al.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities , 2007, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Peirce.  The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[37]  R. Hess,et al.  On the decline of 1st and 2nd order sensitivity with eccentricity. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[38]  T. Meese.  Spatially extensive summation of contrast energy is revealed by contrast detection of micro-pattern textures. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[39]  Updating the Standard Spatial Observer for contrast detection , 2011 .

[40]  T. Meese,et al.  Contrast integration over area is extensive: a three-stage model of spatial summation. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[41]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: a review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[42]  Melchi M. Michel,et al.  Intrinsic position uncertainty explains detection and localization performance in peripheral vision. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[43]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: The extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry , 2012, Vision Research.

[44]  T. Meese,et al.  Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty: evidence for a noisy energy model. , 2012, Journal of vision.