Animal-to-robot social attachment: initial requisites in a gallinaceous bird.

Animal-Robot Interaction experiments have demonstrated their usefulness to understand the social behaviour of a growing number of animal species. In order to study the mechanisms of social influences (from parents and peers) on behavioural development, we design an experimental setup where young quail chicks, after hatching, continuously live with autonomous mobile robots in mixed triadic groups of two chicks and one robot. As precocial birds are subject to imprinting, we compare groups where chicks meet the robot as their very first social partner, on their first day after hatching (R chicks), with groups where chicks meet a real conspecific first (C chicks), and the robot later (on the second day after hatching). We measured the behavioural synchronization between chicks and robot over three days. Afterwards, we directly tested the existence of a possible social bond between animal and robot, by performing separation-reunion behavioural tests. R chicks were more synchronized with the robot in their daily feeding-resting activities than C chicks. Moreover, R chicks emitted numerous distress calls when separated from the robot, even in the presence of another chick, whereas C chicks emitted calls only when separated from the other chick. Whether the observed chick-robot attachment bond reflects filial, or sibling-imprinting of chicks towards the robot remains unclear, as the latter process is not fully understood in natural familial groups. Still, these results reveal the necessary initial conditions for stable, cohesive mixed groups of chicks and robots, a promising tool to experiment on the long-term dynamics of social behaviour.

[1]  Giovanni Polverino,et al.  Closed-loop control of zebrafish response using a bioinspired robotic-fish in a preference test , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  S. Lumineau,et al.  Ultradian Rhythm of Activity in Japanese Quail Groups under Semi-Natural Conditions during Ontogeny: Functional Aspects and Relation to Circadian Rhythm , 2001 .

[3]  F. Pittet,et al.  Motherless quail mothers display impaired maternal behavior and produce more fearful and less socially motivated offspring. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[4]  M. Richard-Yris,et al.  Maternal Influences on Feeding and General Activity in Domestic Chicks , 2002 .

[5]  E. Margerie,et al.  Maternal styles in a precocial bird , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  S. Lumineau,et al.  ONTOGENY OF THE ULTRADIAN RHYTHM OF ACTIVITY IN JAPANESE QUAIL , 2000, Chronobiology international.

[7]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Building a safe robot for behavioral biology experiments , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[8]  C. Houdelier,et al.  Maternal Epigenetic Transmission of Social Motivation in Birds , 2008 .

[9]  C. Cate,et al.  Stimulus Movement, Hen Behaviour and Filial Imprinting in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) , 2010 .

[10]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Influence of robotic shoal size, configuration, and activity on zebrafish behavior in a free-swimming environment , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  Cécile Schweitzer,et al.  Caractérisation des liens sociaux chez la caille japonaise (Coturnix japonica) : motivation sociale et lien entre familiers , 2009 .

[12]  S. Gaioni,et al.  Distress calling induced by reductions in group size in ducklings reared with conspecifics or imprinting stimuli , 1982 .

[13]  E. Acevedo,et al.  Corticosterone response in the chick separation–stress paradigm , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  M. Porfiri,et al.  Fish and robot dancing together: bluefin killifish females respond differently to the courtship of a robot with varying color morphs , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Dogs rapidly develop socially competent behaviour while interacting with a contingently responding self-propelled object , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Porfiri,et al.  Zebrafish response to robotic fish: preference experiments on isolated individuals and small shoals , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[18]  E. de Margerie,et al.  Development of Fearfulness in Birds: Genetic Factors Modulate Non-Genetic Maternal Influences , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  E. Collias,et al.  Some Mechanisms of Family Integration in Ducks , 1956 .

[20]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  A novel method for investigating the collective behaviour of fish: introducing ‘Robofish’ , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  M. Porfiri,et al.  A Robotics-Based Behavioral Paradigm to Measure Anxiety-Related Responses in Zebrafish , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  G. Horn,et al.  Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  P. Backwell,et al.  Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Live predators, robots, and computer-animated images elicit differential avoidance responses in zebrafish. , 2015, Zebrafish.

[26]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[27]  C. Houdelier,et al.  Epigenetic Maternal Effects on Endogenous Rhythms in Precocial Birds , 2009, Chronobiology international.

[28]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Sexual selection: Male displays adjusted to female's response , 2002, Nature.

[29]  A. Göth,et al.  Ecological approaches to species recognition in birds through studies of model and non-model species , 2004 .

[30]  R. Lickliter,et al.  Effects of early and delayed visual experience on intersensory development in bobwhite quail chicks. , 1993, Developmental psychobiology.

[31]  T. Ord,et al.  Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  C. Carter,et al.  Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model , 1995, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Influence of age of chicks on maternal behaviour in domestic hens , 1987 .

[34]  S. Partan,et al.  Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  C. Leterrier,et al.  Mothering influences the distribution of activity in young domestic chicks , 2002, Chronobiology international.

[36]  A. Göth,et al.  Social responses without early experience: Australian brush-turkey chicks use specific visual cues to aggregate with conspecifics , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  A. B. Dyer,et al.  Auditory basis of maternal attachment in ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos) under simulated naturalistic imprinting conditions. , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  N. E. Collias,et al.  The Development of Social Behavior in Birds , 1952 .

[39]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Interactive robots in experimental biology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  F. Pittet,et al.  Age Affects the Expression of Maternal Care and Subsequent Behavioural Development of Offspring in a Precocial Bird , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering , 2009 .

[42]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[43]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  What Are You or Who Are You? The Emergence of Social Interaction between Dog and an Unidentified Moving Object (UMO) , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  A. D. Mills,et al.  The behavior of the japanese or domestic quail Coturnix japonica , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[45]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Towards mixed societies of chickens and robots , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[46]  M. Hennessy Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Responses to Brief Social Separation , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  Johan J. Bolhuis,et al.  MECHANISMS OF AVIAN IMPRINTING: A REVIEW , 1991, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[48]  E. de Margerie,et al.  Effect of mothering on the spatial exploratory behavior of quail chicks. , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.

[49]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Information Flow in Animal-Robot Interactions , 2014, Entropy.

[50]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  European starlings recognize the location of robotic conspecific attention , 2014, Biology Letters.

[51]  Stephen Cameron,et al.  Experiments in automatic flock control , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[52]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Modulation of rat behaviour by using a rat-like robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[53]  R. Lickliter,et al.  Visually imprinted maternal preference in ducklings is redirected by social interaction with siblings. , 1986, Developmental psychobiology.

[54]  E de Margerie,et al.  Influence of a mobile robot on the spatial behaviour of quail chicks , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[55]  M. Koshiba,et al.  Peer attachment formation by systemic redox regulation with social training after a sensitive period , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Collective Response of Zebrafish Shoals to a Free-Swimming Robotic Fish , 2013, PloS one.

[57]  J. Guyomarc'h,et al.  Vocal communication in European quail ; comparison with Japanese quail , 1996 .