High-Powered and Low-Powered Incentives in the Public Sector

Transaction-cost economics currently has a strong influence on the study of private-sector institutions, but attempts to apply it to the public sector have been less successful, particularly in the area of internal organization. I argue that the standard framework of transaction-cost economics must be adjusted to the distinctive characteristics of the public sector, and that the key is a rethinking of the idea of high-powered and low-powered incentives. I show that with this extension transaction-cost economics can provide insight into such important current issues as earmarking, public authorities, and civil service personnel systems.

[1]  T. Moe The New Economics of Organization , 1984 .

[2]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences , 2023 .

[3]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story , 1990 .

[4]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[5]  A. Rivlin The Continuing Search for a Popular Tax , 1989 .

[6]  H. Hansmann,et al.  The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise , 1980 .

[7]  J. M. Buchanan The Economics of Earmarked Taxes , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Annmarie Hauck Walsh,et al.  The public's business: The politics and practices of government corporations , 1978 .

[9]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[10]  D. Heckathorn,et al.  Bargaining and the , 1987 .

[11]  Howard L. Frant Rules and Governance in the Public Sector: The Case of Civil Service , 1993 .

[12]  M. Fiorina Group Concentration and the Delegation of Legislative Authority , 1982 .

[13]  David L. Weimer,et al.  Government Supply and Government Production Failure: A Framework Based on Contestability , 1990, Journal of Public Policy.

[14]  Donald J. Calista Bureaucratic and Governmental Reform , 1987 .

[15]  Richard Elling Civil Service, Collective Bargaining and Personnel-Related Impediments To Effective State Management: a Comparative Assessment , 1986 .

[16]  Institutional Economics of Public Firms and Administrations Some Guidelines for Efficiency-Oriented Design , 1994 .

[17]  The Market for Corporate Control and the Market for Political Control , 1987 .

[18]  B. Weisbrod,et al.  Rewarding Performance That Is Hard to Measure: The Private Nonprofit Sector , 1989, Science.

[19]  J. Donahue The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means , 1991 .

[20]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[21]  H. Rainey,et al.  Public Agencies and Private Firms , 1983 .

[22]  H. Leonard Checks Unbalanced: The Quiet Side of Public Spending , 1986 .