Continuous reaction time in brain damage.

Summary Brain-damaged patients have significantly slower visual RTs than control patients under simple and choice RT conditions on a continuous experimenter paced task with constant intervals between stimuli. The brain-damaged are more variable than control Ss, but this variability is not due to a skewing of slow responses; rather the whole distribution appears to be shifted in the slower direction. No performance decline is present in the Ss despite about 40 minutes of continual RT performance and they do not get more variable over trials. Both controls and braindamaged have significantly longer RTs under the choice conditions, but the added increment in RT is of similar magnitude in both groups. Thus the simple RT is as discriminating between groups as the choice RT task. Under these experimental conditions brain-damaged Ss manifest a deficit in RT performance which cannot be explained by lapses in attention or greater fatigue or “slowed”mental operations of a perceptual matching nature.

[1]  S. Sternberg Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[2]  D. Benson,et al.  Disturbances in constructional ability. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[3]  A. Benton,et al.  Simple and choice reaction time in cerebral disease. , 1955, Confinia neurologica.

[4]  A. Benton,et al.  Reaction time in unilateral cerebral disease. , 1959, Confinia neurologica.

[5]  J. P. Frankmann,et al.  Theories of vigilance. , 1962 .

[6]  A. Benton,et al.  Practice effects in reaction-time tasks in brain-injured patients. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  R D MCDONALD,et al.  Visual vigilance and brain damage: an empirical study , 1964, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  H E ROSVOLD,et al.  A continuous performance test of brain damage. , 1956, Journal of consulting psychology.

[9]  H. Birch,et al.  THE DISORDERING OF INTERSENSORY AND INTRASENSORY INTEGRATION BY BRAIN DAMAGE , 1965 .

[10]  E. Renzi,et al.  The Comparative Efficiency of Intelligence and Vigilance Tests in Detecting Hemispheric Cerebral Damage , 1965 .

[11]  A. Benton,et al.  THE CROSSMODAL RETARDATION IN REACTION TIME OF PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL DISEASE , 1962, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[12]  Shankweiler Dp Effects of success and failure instructions on reaction time in patients with brain damage. , 1959 .

[13]  E. Miller,et al.  Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[14]  P. Bruhn,et al.  DISTURBANCES OF VIGILANCE IN SUBCORTICAL EPILEPSY , 1970, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[15]  L. D. Costa Visual Reaction Time of Patients with Cerebral Disease as a Function of Length and Constancy of Preparatory Interval , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.