Application of the Robotic-Assisted Digital Exoscope for Resection of Posterior Fossa Tumors in Adults: A Series of 45 Cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Complete safe resection is the goal when pursuing surgical treatment for posterior fossa (PF) tumors. Efforts have led to the development of the exoscope that delineates tumors from non-neoplastic brain. This investigation aims to assess patient outcomes where PF tumor resection is performed with the exoscope by a retromastoid or suboccipital approach. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with PF tumors who underwent exoscope resection from 2017 to 2022. Patient demographics, clinical, operative, and outcome findings were collected. Extent of resection studies were also performed. Associations between perioperative data, discharge disposition, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients (22 male patients) with a median age of 57 years were assessed. Eighteen (40%) and 27 patients (60%) were diagnosed with malignant and benign tumors, respectively. Tumor neurovascular involvement was found in 28 patients (62%). Twenty-four (53%) and 20 (44%) tumors formed in the cerebellum and cerebellopontine angle cistern, respectively. One tumor (2%) was found in the cervicomedullary junction. The mean extent of resection was 96.7% for benign and malignant tumors. The PFS and OS rate at 6 months (PFS6, OS6) was 89.7% and 95.5%, respectively. Neurological complications included sensory loss and motor deficit, with 11 patients reporting no postoperative symptoms. Of the neurological complications, 14 were temporary and 9 were permanent. CONCLUSION: The exoscope is an effective intraoperative visualization tool for delineating PF tumors. In our series, we achieved low postoperative tumor volumes and a high gross total resection rate.

[1]  C. Hadjipanayis,et al.  A Multicenter Study Investigating the Surgeon Experience with a Robotic-Assisted Exoscope as Part of the Neurosurgical Armamentarium. , 2023, World neurosurgery.

[2]  Zhengwei Li,et al.  Management of Posterior Fossa Tumors in Adults Based on the Predictors of Postoperative Hydrocephalus , 2022, Frontiers in Surgery.

[3]  Alexander J. Schupper,et al.  Use of the 3D exoscope for the supracerebellar infratentorial approach in the concorde position: an effective and ergonomic alternative. Illustrative cases , 2022, Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons.

[4]  Steven K. Yarmoska,et al.  Permanent Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion in Adults With Posterior Fossa Tumors: Incidence and Predictors , 2021, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Alexander J. Schupper,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Digital Exoscope for Resection of Cerebral Metastases: A Case Series , 2021, Operative neurosurgery.

[6]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Ergonomics in Spine Surgery , 2021, Clinical spine surgery.

[7]  A. Mahmoud,et al.  Surgical considerations for maximal safe resection of exophytic brainstem glioma in the pediatric age group , 2021, Surgical neurology international.

[8]  Owen P. Leary,et al.  Outcomes of infratentorial cranial surgery for tumor resection in older patients: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program , 2021, Surgical neurology international.

[9]  Alexander J. Schupper,et al.  The Neurosurgeon’s Armamentarium for Gliomas: An Update on Intraoperative Technologies to Improve Extent of Resection , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[10]  Christopher M. Jackson,et al.  The Effects of Postoperative Neurological Deficits on Survival in Patients With Single Brain Metastasis. , 2020, Operative neurosurgery.

[11]  S. Zausinger,et al.  A high-definition 3D exoscope as an alternative to the operating microscope in spinal microsurgery. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  A. Mamdouh,et al.  Surgical outcome of posterior fossa tumours: a Benha experience , 2020, Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery.

[13]  K. Nael,et al.  Postoperative outcomes following glioblastoma resection using a robot-assisted digital surgical exoscope: a case series , 2020, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  P. Gadjradj,et al.  Ergonomics and related physical symptoms among neurosurgeons: ergonomics among neurosurgeons. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[15]  M. Lehecka,et al.  Preliminary experience with a digital robotic exoscope in cranial and spinal surgery: a review of the Synaptive Modus V system , 2019, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[16]  G. Wanna,et al.  The Use of the Exoscope in Lateral Skull Base Surgery: Advantages and Limitations. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[17]  Samuel R. Barber,et al.  Initial Experience with 3-Dimensional Exoscope-Assisted Transmastoid and Lateral Skull Base Surgery , 2019, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  R. Agha,et al.  Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[19]  J. Smirniotopoulos,et al.  Posterior Fossa Tumors in Adult Patients. , 2016, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[20]  J. Elder,et al.  Comparison of endoscope- versus microscope-assisted resection of deep-seated intracranial lesions using a minimally invasive port retractor system. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  S. Engelborghs,et al.  Long-term cognitive deficits following posterior fossa tumor resection: a neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging follow-up study. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[22]  S. Coons,et al.  Is gross-total resection sufficient treatment for posterior fossa ependymomas? , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Surgical treatment of posterior fossa tumors via the occipital transtentorial approach: evaluation of operative safety and results in 14 patients with anterosuperior cerebellar tumors. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  L. Kempe Operative Neurosurgery , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.