Can you Turn it Off?

Contemporary mobile devices continuously interrupt people with notifications in various and changing physical environments. As different places can have different social setting, understanding how disturbing an interruption might be to people around the user is not a straightforward task. To understand how users perceive disturbance in their social environment, we analyze the results of a 3-week user study with 50 participants using the experience sampling method and log analysis. We show that perceptions of disturbance are strongly related to the social norms surrounding the place, such as whether the place is considered private or public, even when controlling for the number of people around the user. Furthermore, users' perceptions of disturbance are also related to the activity carried out on the phone, and the subjective perceptions of isolation from other people in the space. We conclude the paper by discussing how our findings can be used to design new mobile devices that are aware of the social norms and their users' environmental context.

[1]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications , 2014, UbiComp.

[2]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era , 2005, New Media Soc..

[3]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[4]  Morgan G. Ames Managing mobile multitasking: the culture of iPhones on stanford campus , 2013, CSCW.

[5]  Antonio Krüger,et al.  Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Hart Blanton,et al.  Deviance regulation theory: Applications to adolescent social influence. , 2008 .

[7]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Towards Personalized Mobile Interruptibility Estimation , 2006, LoCA.

[8]  Archan Misra,et al.  Need accurate user behaviour?: pay attention to groups! , 2015, UbiComp.

[9]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Understanding the Role of Places and Activities on Mobile Phone Interaction and Usage Patterns , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[10]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  The Frustrations and Benefits of Mobile Device Usage in the Home when Co-Present with Family Members , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[11]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Non‐normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? , 2017, Psicothema.

[12]  Stuart M. Allen,et al.  Interruptibility prediction for ubiquitous systems: conventions and new directions from a growing field , 2015, UbiComp.

[13]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Effect of experience sampling schedules on response rate and recall accuracy of objective self-reports , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  E. Goffman Behavior in Public Places , 1963 .

[15]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of call-availability prediction , 2014, UbiComp.

[16]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[17]  John C. Tang,et al.  Investigating Mobile Users' Ringer Mode Usage and Attentiveness and Responsiveness to Communication , 2015, MobileHCI.

[18]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Exploiting Semantic Annotations for Clustering Geographic Areas and Users in Location-based Social Networks , 2011, The Social Mobile Web.

[19]  Dongman Lee,et al.  Don't Bother Me. I'm Socializing!: A Breakpoint-Based Smartphone Notification System , 2017, CSCW.

[20]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Michael Beigl,et al.  Preliminary investigations about interruptibility of smartphone users at specific place types , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[22]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Ryan Allred,et al.  The “Mere Presence” Hypothesis: Investigating the Nonverbal Effects of Cell-Phone Presence on Conversation Satisfaction , 2017 .

[24]  Ryan Dwyer,et al.  Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions , 2017, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

[25]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control, and Urban Sociability , 2012 .

[26]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  My Phone and Me: Understanding People's Receptivity to Mobile Notifications , 2016, CHI.

[27]  J. B. Harvey The Fall of Public Man , 1977 .

[28]  S. Silverstein Woman, Culture and Society , 1975, African Studies Review.

[29]  Peter Vorderer,et al.  Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging applications and face-to-face interactions , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Naranker Dulay,et al.  RingLearn: Long-term mitigation of disruptive smartphone interruptions , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[31]  Antonio Krüger,et al.  Interrupted by a phone call: exploring designs for lowering the impact of call notifications for smartphone users , 2014, CHI.

[32]  Georg Groh,et al.  Studying how character of conversation affects personal receptivity to mobile notifications , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Janne Lindqvist,et al.  How Busy Are You?: Predicting the Interruptibility Intensity of Mobile Users , 2017, CHI.

[34]  魏然,et al.  Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness , 2003 .

[35]  Veljko Pejovic,et al.  A Survey of Attention Management Systems in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[36]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[37]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Texting while Parenting: How Adults Use Mobile Phones while Caring for Children at the Playground , 2015, CHI.

[38]  Kyle Taylor,et al.  Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally , 2019 .

[39]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Technologies for Enhancing Collocated Social Interaction: Review of Design Solutions and Approaches , 2019, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  Alessandra Russo,et al.  When did your smartphone bother you last? , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[41]  Jordan Frith,et al.  Locative Mobile Social Networks: Mapping Communication and Location in Urban Spaces , 2010 .

[42]  Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna,et al.  Email Makes You Sweat: Examining Email Interruptions and Stress Using Thermal Imaging , 2019, CHI.

[43]  Yair Levy,et al.  Do instant messaging interruptions help or hinder knowledge workers' task performance? , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[44]  T. Ojala,et al.  From cyberpunk to calm urban computing: Exploring the role of technology in the future cityscape , 2014 .

[45]  Jérôme Hansen,et al.  Sound Moves: iPod Culture and Urban Experience , 2008 .

[46]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  A model for human interruptability: experimental evaluation and automatic estimation from wearable sensors , 2004, Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[47]  Frank Bentley,et al.  "It's Kind of Boring Looking at Just the Face" , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[49]  J. Urry,et al.  Mobile Transformations of `Public' and `Private' Life , 2003 .

[50]  Meredith E. David,et al.  Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Eran Toch,et al.  The emergence of portable private-personal territory: Smartphones, social conduct and public spaces , 2016 .

[52]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  The Mobile Phone’s Ring , 2008 .

[53]  Katarzyna Wac,et al.  Getting closer: an empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[54]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  Designing Urban Pervasive Systems , 2006, Computer.

[55]  Takanori Ichikawa,et al.  Attention and engagement-awareness in the wild: A large-scale study with adaptive notifications , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[56]  Georg Groh,et al.  Conversational context helps improve mobile notification management , 2016, MobileHCI.

[57]  Jason I. Hong,et al.  Undistracted driving: a mobile phone that doesn't distract , 2011, HotMobile '11.

[58]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Empirical models of privacy in location sharing , 2010, UbiComp.

[59]  Niels van Berkel,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[60]  David Alan Grier The lay of the land [pervasive computing system] , 2006, Computer.

[61]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model, , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[62]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Understanding Mobile Contexts , 2003, Mobile HCI.

[63]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[64]  Gloria Mark,et al.  How Do Interruptions Affect Productivity? , 2019, Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering.

[65]  Michael Beigl,et al.  Smartphone-Based Estimation of a User Being in Company or Alone Based on Place, Time, and Activity , 2018, MobiCASE.

[66]  Michael Chan,et al.  Mobile phones and the good life: Examining the relationships among mobile use, social capital and subjective well-being , 2015, New Media Soc..

[67]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  PrefMiner: mining user's preferences for intelligent mobile notification management , 2016, UbiComp.

[68]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Intelligent Notification Systems: A Survey of the State of the Art and Research Challenges , 2017, ArXiv.

[69]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  The effects of "phubbing" on social interaction , 2018 .

[70]  Michael Beigl,et al.  Preferred notification modalities depending on the location and the location-based activity , 2019, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.