Comparison of pollution flashover performance of porcelain long rod, disc type, and composite UHVDC insulators at high altitudes

Aiming at porcelain long rod, disc type and composite long rod UHVDC insulators, this paper presents a comparison of their dc pollution flashover performances and an analysis of arcing behavior at high altitudes (1970m). The solid layer method was used in artificial pollution tests, in which sodium chloride and kaolin powder were used to simulate conductive and inert materials. The insulators were wetted by steam fog in a fog chamber. The 50% flashover voltage (U50%) was measured with the up-and-down method. According to the test results, the three types of insulators are similar in the characteristic exponent which characterizes influence of the salt deposit density on the flashover voltage. Due to lower utilization ratio of leakage distances, pollution flashover voltage gradient for the porcelain long rod insulators is lower than that for the disc type insulators. Whereas covered with Room Temperature Vulcanized (RTV) silicone rubber coatings on the trunk surfaces, the porcelain long rod insulator is much superior to the disc type insulators in pollution flashover voltage gradient. The dc pollution flashover performance and the utilization ratio of leakage distances for the composite long rod insulators are much better than those for the other two types of insulators, which are induced by the special configuration of composite long rod insulators.

[1]  E. Bauer,et al.  Porcelain and Composite Longrod Insulatoes - A Solution for Future Line Requirements , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[2]  T. Fujimura,et al.  DC Flashover Voltage Characteristics of Contaminated Insulatirs , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[3]  T. Shindo,et al.  Natural contamination test of insulators with DC voltage energization at inland areas , 1988 .

[4]  W. Lampe,et al.  Long-term tests of HVDC insulators under natural pollution conditions at the Big Eddy Test Center , 1989 .

[5]  T. C. Cheng,et al.  A study on the profile of HVDC insulators-DC flashover performance , 1989 .

[6]  T. Fujimura The evolution of porcelain insulator technology in Japan , 1995 .

[7]  Chen Yuan Polarity effect of DC contamination flashover of composite insulators , 1999 .

[8]  R. Matsuoka,et al.  Investigation of Contamination Flashover Voltage of A Porcelain Long Rod Insulator with Silicone Rubber Coating on The Trunks , 2006, 2006 IEEE 8th International Conference on Properties & applications of Dielectric Materials.

[9]  Su Zhi-yi Contamination Flashover Performance of DC Insulator Strings , 2006 .

[10]  Effect of core diameter of cylindrical polymer insulators on contamination flashover voltage—part I , 2006 .

[11]  J.M. Seifert,et al.  A comparison of the pollution performance of long rod and disc type HVDC insulators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[12]  Xingliang Jiang,et al.  Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  R. Matsuoka,et al.  Improvement of Contamination Flashover Voltage Performance of Cylindrical Porcelain Insulators , 2008, Conference Record of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation.

[14]  Zhicheng Guan,et al.  Experimental Investigation on Outdoor Insulation for DC Transmission Line at High Altitudes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.