On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers

Decline in engineering enrollment continues and renewed efforts are required to improve enrollment and diversity. Herein, we address this problem by conducting research to understand engineering students through the lens of identity theory. Implications of this effort are twofold: (1) to contribute to our basic understanding of engineering students' identities as well as what factors (experiences and settings) foster the formation and transformation of these identities during the undergraduate experience, and from these findings (2) to gain insight into improving recruitment and retention of engineering students, particularly students underrepresented in engineering. By conducting focus groups and interviews, our goal was to understand professional identity development in freshman engineering persisters and freshman engineering switchers. Initial findings suggest that exposure to meaningful engineering-related experiences and engineers are critical in developing an engineer identity. Our future efforts involve understanding the longitudinal nature of professional identity development (from freshman to senior years).

[1]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[2]  James D. Lee Which Kids Can ‘Become’ Scientists? Effects of Gender, Self-Concepts and Perceptions of Scientists , 1998 .

[3]  N. Brown,et al.  Description of Personality Similarities and Differences of a Sample of Black and White Female Engineering Students , 1997 .

[4]  T. Owens,et al.  Self and Identity , 2006 .

[5]  C. Atman,et al.  Gender and Ethnicity Differences in Freshmen Engineering Student Attitudes: A Cross‐Institutional Study * , 2001 .

[6]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  A Method for Identifying Variables for Predicting STEM Enrollment , 2007 .

[7]  Peter J. Burke The self–society dynamic: Attitudes, behavior, and the self , 1991 .

[8]  Cindy E. Foor,et al.  “I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:” Achieving Individual Diversity , 2007 .

[9]  Karan Watson,et al.  Diversifying the U.S. Engineering Workforce: A New Model , 2007 .

[10]  James D. Lee,et al.  More than Ability: Gender and Personal Relationships Influence Science and Technology Involvement , 2002 .

[11]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Understanding Our Students: A Longitudinal‐Study of Success and Failure in Engineering With Implications for Increased Retention , 2007 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[14]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[15]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Student Engineers and Engineer Identity: Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World , 2006 .

[16]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[19]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification , 1997 .

[20]  P. Burke,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory* , 2000 .

[21]  R. Layton,et al.  Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs , 2008 .