Hyaluronic acid-based 3D culture model for in vitro testing of electrode biocompatibility.

This work describes the development of a robust and repeatable in vitro 3D culture model of glial scarring, which may be used to evaluate the foreign body response to electrodes and other implants in the central nervous system. The model is based on methacrylated hyaluronic acid, a hydrogel that may be photopolymerized to form an insoluble network. Hydrogel scaffolds were formed at four different macromer concentrations (0.50, 0.75, 1.00, and 1.50% (w/v)). As expected, the elastic modulus of the scaffolds increased with increasing macromer weight fraction. Adult rat brain tested under identical conditions had an elastic modulus range that spanned the elastic modulus of both the 0.50 and 0.75% (w/v) hydrogel samples. Gels formed with higher macromer weight fraction had decreased equilibrium swelling ratio and visibly thicker pore walls relative to gels formed with lower macromer weight fractions. Mixed glial cells (microglia and astrocytes) were then encapsulated in the HA scaffolds. Viability of the mixed cultures was most stable at a cell density of 1 × 10(7) cells/mL. Cell viability at the highest macromer weight fraction tested (1.50% (w/v)) was significantly lower than other tested gels (0.50, 0.75 and 1.00% (w/v)). The inflammatory response of microglia and astrocytes to a microelectrode inserted into the scaffold was assessed over a period of 2 weeks and closely represented that reported in vivo. Microglia responded first to the electrode (increased cell density at the electrode, and activated morphology) followed by astrocytes (appeared to line the electrode in a manner similar to glial scarring). All together, these results demonstrate the potential of the 3D in vitro model system to assess glial scarring in a robust and repeatable manner.

[1]  M. Shoichet,et al.  Biomaterials for Brain Tissue Engineering , 2010 .

[2]  Jean-Marc Fellous,et al.  In vitro model of glial scarring around neuroelectrodes chronically implanted in the CNS. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[3]  O. Okay General Properties of Hydrogels , 2009 .

[4]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  A Flexible Base Electrode Array for Intraspinal Microstimulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Ian T. Hoffecker,et al.  Presence of pores and hydrogel composition influence tensile properties of scaffolds fabricated from well-defined sphere templates. , 2011, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[6]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  B. Morrison,et al.  In Vitro Models for Biomechanical Studies of Neural Tissues , 2011 .

[8]  Yousef Al-Kofahi,et al.  Associative image analysis: A method for automated quantification of 3D multi-parameter images of brain tissue , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  B. Pakkenberg,et al.  Neocortical glial cell numbers in human brains , 2008, Neurobiology of Aging.

[10]  R. Auzély-Velty,et al.  Design of biomimetic cell-interactive substrates using hyaluronic acid hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[11]  J. Burdick,et al.  Macromer density influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis and maturation in photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  R. Neufeld,et al.  Modeling the controllable pH-responsive swelling and pore size of networked alginate based biomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[13]  Ravi V. Bellamkonda,et al.  Dexamethasone-coated neural probes elicit attenuated inflammatory response and neuronal loss compared to uncoated neural probes , 2007, Brain Research.

[14]  William Shain,et al.  Effects of Glial Cells on Electrode Impedance Recorded from Neural Prosthetic Devices In Vitro , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Clayton J. Underwood,et al.  Characterization of microglial attachment and cytokine release on biomaterials of differing surface chemistry. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[17]  W Shain,et al.  Fabrication and optimization of alginate hydrogel constructs for use in 3D neural cell culture , 2011, Biomedical materials.

[18]  E. Yavin,et al.  Apoptotic death in cerebral hemisphere cells is density dependent and modulated by transient oxygen and glucose deprivation , 1997, Journal of neuroscience research.

[19]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[20]  Wolfgang Eberle,et al.  Effect of Insertion Speed on Tissue Response and Insertion Mechanics of a Chronically Implanted Silicon-Based Neural Probe , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Tanuj Gulati,et al.  Braided multi-electrode probes: mechanical compliance characteristics and recordings from spinal cords , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Emma East,et al.  Engineering an integrated cellular interface in three-dimensional hydrogel cultures permits monitoring of reciprocal astrocyte and neuronal responses. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[23]  Ying Wang,et al.  Hyaluronic acid-based scaffold for central neural tissue engineering , 2012, Interface Focus.

[24]  Hsi-Chin Wu,et al.  Control of three-dimensional substrate stiffness to manipulate mesenchymal stem cell fate toward neuronal or glial lineages. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  Gulden Camci-Unal,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of hybrid hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogels. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[26]  John W Haycock,et al.  3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[27]  M. Grinstaff,et al.  Photocrosslinkable polysaccharides for in situ hydrogel formation. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  Subbu Venkatraman,et al.  Photopolymerization of cell-encapsulating hydrogels: crosslinking efficiency versus cytotoxicity. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  D. Humphrey,et al.  Long-term gliosis around chronically implanted platinum electrodes in the Rhesus macaque motor cortex , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Jonas B. Zimmermann,et al.  Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord—restoring motor function , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[31]  Yuan-Ting Zhang,et al.  Grand Challenges in Interfacing Engineering With Life Sciences and Medicine , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  Krzysztof Matyjaszewski,et al.  Influence of the degree of methacrylation on hyaluronic acid hydrogels properties. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[34]  Guangzhao Mao,et al.  Examining the inflammatory response to nanopatterned polydimethylsiloxane using organotypic brain slice methods , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[36]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[37]  M. D. Oliveira,et al.  Effect of the cross-linking degree on the morphology of poly(NIPAAm-co-AAc) hydrogels , 2007 .

[38]  Kenneth A. Barbee,et al.  Long-Term Recordings of Multiple, Single-Neurons for Clinical Applications: The Emerging Role of the Bioactive Microelectrode , 2009, Materials.

[39]  Karl-Friedrich Arndt,et al.  Hydrogel Sensors and Actuators , 2009 .

[40]  James P. Harris,et al.  Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[41]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[42]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[43]  M. Murphy,et al.  p21cip1 rescues human mesenchymal stem cells from apoptosis induced by low-density culture , 1998, Cell and Tissue Research.

[44]  D J Weber,et al.  In vivo effects of L1 coating on inflammation and neuronal health at the electrode-tissue interface in rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[45]  Jason B Shear,et al.  The effects of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties on neural progenitor cell differentiation. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[46]  K. Todd,et al.  Hypoxia‐activated microglial mediators of neuronal survival are differentially regulated by tetracyclines , 2006, Glia.

[47]  J. West,et al.  Visible light photoinitiation of mesenchymal stem cell-laden bioresponsive hydrogels. , 2011, European cells & materials.

[48]  X. Mo,et al.  Fabrication of gelatin-hyaluronic acid hybrid scaffolds with tunable porous structures for soft tissue engineering. , 2011, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[49]  Pamela J VandeVord,et al.  Alginate-matrigel microencapsulated Schwann cells for inducible secretion of glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor , 2008, Journal of microencapsulation.

[50]  Daniele Nosi,et al.  The Neuron-Astrocyte-Microglia Triad in Normal Brain Ageing and in a Model of Neuroinflammation in the Rat Hippocampus , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  S. Roberts,et al.  The influence of nutrient supply and cell density on the growth and survival of intervertebral disc cells in 3D culture. , 2011, European cells & materials.