SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Updegraff. The visual perception of distance in young children and adults : a comparative study , 1930 .
[2] H. Carr. An introduction to space perception , 1935 .
[3] A. H. Hastorf,et al. The influence of suggestion on the relationship between stimulus size and perceived distance. , 1950, The Journal of psychology.
[4] W. H. Ittelson,et al. Accommodation, Convergence, and Their Relation to Apparent Distance , 1950 .
[5] W. H. Ittelson,et al. Size as a cue to distance; radial motion. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.
[6] W M SMITH,et al. Sensitivity to apparent movement in depth as a function of "property of movement". , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.
[7] W. H. Ittelson. Size as a cue to distance: static localization. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.
[8] The constancies in perceptual theory. , 1951 .
[9] W. M. Smith. Past experience and the perception of visual size. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.
[10] W M SMITH,et al. Sensitivity to apparent movement in depth as a function of stimulus dimensionality. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.
[11] J. Hochberg,et al. Familiar size and the perception of depth. , 1952 .
[12] W. H. Ittelson. A Note on “Familiar Size and the Perception of Depth” , 1953 .
[13] Julian Hochberg,et al. Familiar Size and Subception in Perceived Depth , 1953 .
[14] W. H. Ittelson,et al. The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.
[15] W. Gogel,et al. Perception of the relative distance position of objects as a function of other objects in the field. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[16] W. M. Smith. Effect of monocular and binocular vision, brightness, and apparent size on the sensitivity to apparent movement in depth. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.
[17] G S HARKER,et al. The effectiveness of size cues to relative distance as a function of lateral visual separation. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.
[18] J E HOCHBERG,et al. Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.
[19] W. Gogel,et al. THE TENDENCY TO SEE OBJECTS AS EQUIDISTANT AND ITS INVERSE RELATION TO LATERAL SEPARATION , 1956 .
[20] Walter C. Gogel,et al. Relative visual direction as a factor in relative distance perceptions. , 1956 .
[21] Walter C. Gogel,et al. The retinal size of a familiar object as a determiner of apparent distance. , 1957 .
[22] Walter C. Gogel. Perceived Frontal Size as a Determiner of Perceived Binocular Depth , 1960 .
[23] W. Epstein. The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.
[24] W. H. Ittelson. Visual space perception , 1961 .
[25] W C GOGEL,et al. Convergence as a cue to absolute distance. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.
[26] W. Epstein,et al. The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.
[27] The nature of perception: Some visual demonstrations. , 1961 .
[28] W C GOGEL,et al. The visual perception of size and distance. , 1962, [Report]. Civil Aeromedical Research Institute.
[29] W. Epstein. The Influence of Assumed Size on Apparent Distance , 1963 .
[30] D. Adelson. THE RELATIONAL INFLUENCE OF SIZE ON JUDGMENTS OF DISTANCE. , 1963, The Journal of general psychology.
[31] Baird Jc. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.
[32] R. Over. Size- and distance-estimates of a single stimulus under different viewing conditions. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.
[33] W C GOGEL,et al. PERCEPTION OF DEPTH FROM BINOCULAR DISPARITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.
[34] Effective Difference in Influence of Relative Size on Perceived Relative Distance , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.
[35] W. Epstein,et al. RELATIVE SIZE IN ISOLATION AS A STIMULUS FOR RELATIVE PERCEIVED DISTANCE. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.
[36] W C GOGEL,et al. VISUAL PERCEPTION OF SPATIAL EXTENT. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.