Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors.

Spatial unmasking describes the improvement in the detection or identification of a target sound afforded by separating it spatially from simultaneous masking sounds. This effect has been studied extensively for speech intelligibility in the presence of interfering sounds. In the current study, listeners identified zebra finch song, which shares many acoustic properties with speech but lacks semantic and linguistic content. Three maskers with the same long-term spectral content but different short-term statistics were used: (1) chorus (combinations of unfamiliar zebra finch songs), (2) song-shaped noise (broadband noise with the average spectrum of chorus), and (3) chorus-modulated noise (song-shaped noise multiplied by the broadband envelope from a chorus masker). The amount of masking and spatial unmasking depended on the masker and there was evidence of release from both energetic and informational masking. Spatial unmasking was greatest for the statistically similar chorus masker. For the two noise maskers, there was less spatial unmasking and it was wholly accounted for by the relative target and masker levels at the acoustically better ear. The results share many features with analogous results using speech targets, suggesting that spatial separation aids in the segregation of complex natural sounds through mechanisms that are not specific to speech.

[1]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  T W Tillman,et al.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Stewart H. Hulse,et al.  Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .

[5]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Informational masking by everyday sounds. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[10]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B. Franklin Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. , 1981 .

[12]  Robert A Lutfi,et al.  Psychometric functions for informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  W. Hartmann,et al.  The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification , 2005 .

[14]  Micheal L Dent,et al.  The precedence effect in three species of birds (Melopsittacus undulatus, Serinus canaria, and Taeniopygia guttata). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  Brian S. Nelson,et al.  Sound localization in a small passerine bird: discrimination of azimuth as a function of head orientation and sound frequency , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Auditory informational masking , 1975 .

[17]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Zann The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies , 1996 .

[19]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Mason,et al.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R J Dooling,et al.  Sound localization in small birds: absolute localization in azimuth. , 1991, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  H. Steven Colburn,et al.  Computational Models of Binaural Processing , 1996 .

[26]  T W Tillman,et al.  Release of masking for speech through interaural time delay. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R A Lutfi A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.