Contributory inequality alters assessment of academic output gap between comparable countries

[1]  S. Franz.  The Scientific Productivity of American Professional Psychologists , 2016 .

[2]  William H. Walters,et al.  Worldwide contributors to the literature of library and information science: top authors, 2007–2012 , 2014, Scientometrics.

[3]  João M. Fernandes,et al.  Authorship trends in software engineering , 2014, Scientometrics.

[4]  Thomas Hildebrand,et al.  The distribution of partnership returns: Evidence from co-authorships in economics journals , 2014 .

[5]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Reversing the byline hierarchy: The effect of equalizing bias on the accreditation of primary, secondary and senior authors , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[8]  L. Ceriani,et al.  The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini , 2012 .

[9]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[10]  D. Hicks.  Performance-based university research funding systems , 2012 .

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff.  World shares of publications of the USA, EU-27, and China compared and predicted using the new web of science interface versus scopus , 2012 .

[12]  P. Boekholt,et al.  Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway , 2012 .

[13]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[14]  James Wilsdon.  Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century , 2011 .

[15]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[16]  Jesper W. Schneider.  Bibliometric Research Performance Indicators for the Nordic Countries : A publication from the NORIA-net "The use of bibliometrics in research policy and evaluation activities" , 2010 .

[17]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically , 2009, Scientometrics.

[18]  B. Godin.  The value of science: changing conceptions of scientific productivity, 1869 to circa 1970 , 2009 .

[19]  N. T. Hagen,et al.  Credit for Coauthors , 2009, Science.

[20]  Nils T. Hagen,et al.  Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis , 2008, PloS one.

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Nicoline Frølich,et al.  Science policy and the driving forces behind the internationalisation of science: The case of Norway , 2008 .

[23]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Comparisons of results of publication counting using different methods , 2008, Scientometrics.

[24]  H. Nowotny.  How Many Policy Rooms are There? , 2007 .

[25]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Scientific collaboration , 2007, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.

[26]  Benoît Godin,et al.  On the origins of bibliometrics , 2006, Scientometrics.

[27]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  Symmetry and other transformation features of Lorenz/Leimkuhler representations of informetric data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies , 2005, Scientometrics.

[29]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distributions: Two new approaches: Research Articles , 2005 .

[30]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distributions: Two new approaches , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  The Bradford distribution and the Gini index , 1991, Scientometrics.

[32]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  British science in the 1980s — Has the relative decline continued? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[33]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2004, Scientometrics.

[34]  T. Keats,et al.  On multiple authorship. , 1996, Skeletal radiology.

[35]  T. Braun.  On some historical antecedents of the belief in the decline of British science , 1993, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  M. Nye.  Scientific Decline: Is Quantitative Evaluation Enough? , 1984, Isis.

[37]  S. Hodge,et al.  Publication Credit , 1981, Science.

[38]  M Dym,et al.  Gossypol: effect on testosterone. , 1981, Science.

[39]  Duncan Lindsey,et al.  Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship , 1980 .

[40]  Charles Babbage,et al.  Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, and on Some of Its Causes , 1970 .

[41]  Ferdinand F. Leimkuhler,et al.  THE BRADFORD DISTRIBUTION , 1967 .

[42]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[43]  Donald Cardwell,et al.  The Organisation of Science in England , 1974 .

[44]  M. O. Lorenz,et al.  Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth , 1905, Publications of the American Statistical Association.