A computational study of non-premixed flame extinction by water spray

Abstract The interaction of turbulent non-premixed flames with fine water spray is studied using direct numerical simulations (DNS) with detailed chemistry. The study is of practical importance in fire safety devices that operate in the mist regime, as well as in their use as an inexpensive temperature control mechanism for gas turbines. Dynamics of water spray is represented by the Lagrangian particle-in-cell method, coupled with an Eulerian gas-phase reacting flow solver. The model configuration is a two-dimensional ethylene–air counterflow diffusion flame at moderate strain rates. Laminar and turbulent flame simulations are performed at various water loading conditions. Comparison of various simulation cases highlights the flame weakening characteristics due to aerodynamic stretch and heat loss due to water spray evaporation. Local flame extinction is identified by a flame weakness factor derived based on an asymptotic model under non-adiabatic environments. A statistical analysis of the cumulative turbulent flame data shows that a large heat release enhancement is observed during the flame quenching due to the occurrence of edge flames, while such effects are substantially reduced in the presence of water spray. Findings from this study provide a better understanding of interaction between thermal and aerodynamic quenching in turbulent flame dynamics.

[1]  Chung King Law,et al.  Structure and extinction of diffusion flames with flame radiation , 1991 .

[2]  A. Gomez,et al.  Highly turbulent counterflow flames: A laboratory scale benchmark for practical systems , 2009 .

[3]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  Radiation-driven flame weakening effects in sooting turbulent diffusion flames , 2009 .

[4]  Arnaud Trouvé,et al.  Effect of soot addition on extinction limits of luminous laminar counterflow diffusion flames , 2011 .

[5]  Direct Numerical Simulation of Non-Premixed Flame Extinction by Water Spray , 2010 .

[6]  H. Im,et al.  Structure and propagation of triple flames in partially premixed hydrogen-air mixtures , 1999 .

[7]  C. Sung,et al.  Dynamics of weakly stretched flames: quantitative description and extraction of global flame parameters , 1999 .

[8]  Chung K. Law,et al.  Extinction of counterflow diffusion flames with radiative heat loss and nonunity Lewis numbers , 2007 .

[9]  James F. Driscoll,et al.  Numerical simulation of a laboratory-scale turbulent slot flame , 2007 .

[10]  C. Law,et al.  A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction , 2005 .

[11]  Yi Wang,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of nonpremixed flame–wall interactions , 2006 .

[12]  T. Takeno,et al.  A numerical analysis of the structure of a turbulent hydrogen jet lifted flame , 2002 .

[13]  Andrew E. Lutz,et al.  OPPDIF: A Fortran program for computing opposed-flow diffusion flames , 1997 .

[14]  Amable Liñán,et al.  The asymptotic structure of counterflow diffusion flames for large activation energies , 1974 .

[15]  C. Rutland,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of ignition in turbulent n-heptane liquid-fuel spray jets , 2007 .

[16]  Tianfeng Lu,et al.  Structure of a spatially developing turbulent lean methane–air Bunsen flame , 2007 .

[17]  Ramanan Sankaran,et al.  Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of a turbulent lifted hydrogen jet flame in heated coflow: flame stabilization and structure , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.