Marketing the Unfamiliar: The Role of Context and Item-Specific Information in Electronic Agent Recommendations

Electronic agents have the capacity to help consumers discover new products and generate demand for unfamiliar products. This article explores how consumers respond to recommendations of unfamiliar products made by electronic agents. Two studies using simulated music shopping agents show that (1) additional recommendations of familiar products serve as a context in which unfamiliar recommendations are evaluated; (2) when the presentation of the recommendations makes unfamiliar and familiar products appear similar, evaluative assimilation results; and (3) when additional information about unfamiliar products is given, consumers discriminate them from the familiar products, which produces evaluative contrast. These results establish that information that leads to higher evaluations when context is absent can lead to contrast and lower evaluations in the presence of attractive contextual recommendations.

[1]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  Can the Same Information be Typical and Atypical? How Perceived Typicality Moderates Assimilation and Contrast in Evaluative Judgments , 2000 .

[2]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Agents to the Rescue? , 1999 .

[3]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that buy and sell , 1999, CACM.

[4]  D. Stapel,et al.  Interpretation versus Reference Framing: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in the Organizational Domain. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[5]  Sankar Sen.  Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect , 1998 .

[6]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance , 1998 .

[7]  Alan D. J. Cooke,et al.  Multiattribute judgment : Attribute spacing influences single attributes , 1998 .

[8]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Context effects in political judgement: assimilation and contrast as a function of categorization processes , 1998 .

[9]  Andrew D. Gershoff,et al.  Using a Community of Knowledge to Build Intelligent Agents , 1998 .

[10]  Peter Petzold,et al.  Pragmatic use of categorical information in impression formation , 1998 .

[11]  Diederik A. Stapel,et al.  Assimilation or Contrast?: Comparison Relevance, Distinctness, and the Impact of Accessible Information on Consumer Judgments , 1998 .

[12]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing , 1997 .

[13]  M. Biernat,et al.  Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces , 1997 .

[15]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Context Effects at Encoding and Judgment in Consumption Settings: The Role of Cognitive Resources , 1997 .

[16]  R. Spears,et al.  Event Accessibility and Context Effects in Causal Inference: Judgment of a Different Order , 1996 .

[17]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[18]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[19]  J. March.  Learning to be risk averse. , 1996 .

[20]  Alan D. J. Cooke,et al.  The Role of Task and Context in Preference Measurement , 1996 .

[21]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[22]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[24]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment , 1992 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[26]  Peter W. English,et al.  Simultaneous sampling and length contrast , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[28]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1988 .

[29]  J. Bettman,et al.  Knowledge Structure Differences between More Effective and Less Effective Salespeople , 1988 .

[30]  D. H. Wedell,et al.  A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: Successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation , 1987 .

[31]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness , 1986 .

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  John Uhlarik,et al.  Assimilation and contrast of perceived length depend on temporal factors , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[35]  Peter Wright,et al.  Product Class Advertising Effects on First-Time Buyers' Decision Strategies , 1980 .

[36]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The generalizability of salience effects. , 1979 .

[37]  J. J. Seta,et al.  Effects of contrast and generalization on the attitude similarity–attraction relationship. , 1979 .

[38]  Barton A. Weitz.  Relationship between Salesperson Performance and Understanding of Customer Decision Making , 1978 .

[39]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Studies of similarity , 1978 .

[40]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[41]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  The Influence of Price Differences and Brand Familiarity on Brand Preferences , 1976 .

[42]  B. Weiner,et al.  An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. , 1970 .

[43]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .