A Structured Expert Judgment Study for a Model of Campylobacter Transmission During Broiler‐Chicken Processing

A structured expert judgment study was organized to obtain input data for a microbial risk-assessment model describing the transmission of campylobacter during broiler-chicken processing in the Netherlands. More specially, the expert study was aimed at quantifying the uncertainty on input parameters of this model and focused on the contamination of broiler-chicken carcasses with campylobacter during processing. Following the protocol for structured expert judgment studies, expert assessments were elicited individually through subjective probability distribution functions. The classical model was used to aggregate the individual experts' distributions in order to obtain a single combined distribution per variable. Three different weighting schemes were applied, including equal weighting and performance-based weighting with and without optimalization of the combined distributions. The individual experts' weights were based on their performance on the seed variables. Results of the various weighting schemes are presented in terms of performance, robustness, and combined distributions of the seed variables and some of the query variables. All three weighting schemes had adequate performance, with the optimized combined distributions significantly outperforming both the equal weight and the nonoptimized combined distributions. Hence, this weighting scheme, having adequate robustness, was chosen for further processing of the results.

[1]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Probabilistic accident consequence uncertainty analysis: Dispersion and deposition uncertainty assessment, appendices A and B , 1995 .

[2]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  A chicken processing model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment of Campylobacter , 2003 .

[3]  R. Cooke,et al.  Procedures Guide for Structural Expert Judgement in Accident Consequence Modelling , 2000 .

[4]  Ine H J Van der Fels-Klerx,et al.  Elicitation of Quantitative Data from a Heterogeneous Expert Panel: Formal Process and Application in Animal Health , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  M H Cassin,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers. , 1998, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[7]  M. J. Bogaardt,et al.  Campylobacteriose in Nederland : risico's en interventiemogelijkheden , 2002 .

[8]  N Bemrah,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of human listeriosis from consumption of soft cheese made from raw milk. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Probabilistic inversion for chicken processing lines , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Kaplan,et al.  ‘Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis’ , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Processing expert judgements in accident consequence modelling , 2000 .

[12]  A H Havelaar,et al.  Health burden in the Netherlands due to infection with thermophilic Campylobacter spp. , 2000, Epidemiology and Infection.

[13]  B.C.P. Kraan,et al.  Probabilistic inversion in uncertainty analysis: And related topics , 2002 .

[14]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Applications of some risk assessment techniques: Formal expert judgement and accident sequence precursors , 1997 .

[15]  L.H.J Goossens,et al.  Expert judgement elicitation in risk assessment , 2001 .

[16]  Jane M. Booker,et al.  Eliciting and analyzing expert judgement - a practical guide , 2001, ASA-SIAM series on statistics and applied probability.

[17]  G. N. Kelly,et al.  Editorial - Expert Judgement and Accident Consequence Uncertainty Analysis (COSYMA) , 2000 .

[18]  Evers Eg,et al.  Risk assessment of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichiacoli O157 in steak tartare in the Netherlands , 2001 .

[19]  Arie H Havelaar,et al.  Cross‐Contamination During Food Preparation: A Mechanistic Model Applied to Chicken‐Borne Campylobacter , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Reliability Model for Underground Gas Pipelines , 2003 .

[21]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Expert Judgment in the Uncertainty Analysis of Dike Ring Failure Frequency , 2003 .

[22]  D. N. Prabhakar Murthy,et al.  Case studies in reliability and maintenance , 2002 .

[23]  R Cooke,et al.  A probabilistic model for the failure frequency of underground gas pipelines. , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[25]  Arie H. Havelaar,et al.  Controlling Campylobacter in the chicken meat chain - Towards a decision support model' (Beheersing van Campylobacter in de kippenvleesketen. Naar een beslissingsondersteunend model) , 2004 .

[26]  Arie Havelaar,et al.  A Poultry‐Processing Model for Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  "Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgement, A Practical Guide, " by M. Meyer and J. Booker (Book Review) , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[28]  Arie H. Havelaar,et al.  Controlling Campylobacter in the chicken meat chain , 2004 .

[29]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Expert judgement and lethal toxicity of inhaled chemicals , 1998 .